Abstract
Applicant fairness perceptions of asynchronous job interviews were assessed among panelists (Study 1, N = 160) and highly educated actual applicants (Study 2, N = 103). Furthermore, we also examined whether personality explained applicants' perceptions. Participants, particularly actual applicants, had negative perceptions of the fairness and procedural justice of asynchronous job interviews. Extraverted applicants perceived more opportunity to perform with the asynchronous job interview than introverts. A trait interaction between Neuroticism and Extraversion was tested, but no significant results were found. Although the first selection stage is increasingly digitized, this study shows that applicant perceptions of asynchronous job interviews are relatively negative. The influence of personality on these perceptions appears to be limited.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 138-147 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Personnel Psychology |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- applicant perceptions
- asynchronous job interviews
- personality
- personnel selection
- recruitment The role of personality (i.e., Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Openness to experience) in applicant perceptions was further explored. Study results are available upon request.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Applicant Perceptions of Initial Job Candidate Screening with Asynchronous Job Interviews: Does Personality Matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver