TY - JOUR
T1 - Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnostic radiology
T2 - a technography study
AU - Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad Hosein
AU - van Ooijen, Peter
AU - Homan, Milou
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Objectives: Why is there a major gap between the promises of AI and its applications in the domain of diagnostic radiology? To answer this question, we systematically review and critically analyze the AI applications in the radiology domain. Methods: We systematically analyzed these applications based on their focal modality and anatomic region as well as their stage of development, technical infrastructure, and approval. Results: We identified 269 AI applications in the diagnostic radiology domain, offered by 99 companies. We show that AI applications are primarily narrow in terms of tasks, modality, and anatomic region. A majority of the available AI functionalities focus on supporting the “perception” and “reasoning” in the radiology workflow. Conclusions: Thereby, we contribute by (1) offering a systematic framework for analyzing and mapping the technological developments in the diagnostic radiology domain, (2) providing empirical evidence regarding the landscape of AI applications, and (3) offering insights into the current state of AI applications. Accordingly, we discuss the potential impacts of AI applications on the radiology work and we highlight future possibilities for developing these applications. Key Points: • Many AI applications are introduced to the radiology domain and their number and diversity grow very fast. • Most of the AI applications are narrow in terms of modality, body part, and pathology. • A lot of applications focus on supporting “perception” and “reasoning” tasks.
AB - Objectives: Why is there a major gap between the promises of AI and its applications in the domain of diagnostic radiology? To answer this question, we systematically review and critically analyze the AI applications in the radiology domain. Methods: We systematically analyzed these applications based on their focal modality and anatomic region as well as their stage of development, technical infrastructure, and approval. Results: We identified 269 AI applications in the diagnostic radiology domain, offered by 99 companies. We show that AI applications are primarily narrow in terms of tasks, modality, and anatomic region. A majority of the available AI functionalities focus on supporting the “perception” and “reasoning” in the radiology workflow. Conclusions: Thereby, we contribute by (1) offering a systematic framework for analyzing and mapping the technological developments in the diagnostic radiology domain, (2) providing empirical evidence regarding the landscape of AI applications, and (3) offering insights into the current state of AI applications. Accordingly, we discuss the potential impacts of AI applications on the radiology work and we highlight future possibilities for developing these applications. Key Points: • Many AI applications are introduced to the radiology domain and their number and diversity grow very fast. • Most of the AI applications are narrow in terms of modality, body part, and pathology. • A lot of applications focus on supporting “perception” and “reasoning” tasks.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Forecasting
KW - Radiologists
KW - Radiology
KW - Workflow
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091150709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091150709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-020-07230-9
DO - 10.1007/s00330-020-07230-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85091150709
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 31
SP - 1805
EP - 1811
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 4
ER -