Appropriate Governance Responses to Infectious Disease Threats: Developing Working Hypotheses

Patrick Kenis, Lianne G.C. Schol, Marleen M. Kraaij-Dirkzwager, Aura Timen

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Infectious diseases remain a threat to public health in today's interconnected world. There is an ongoing debate on how responses to threats of infectious diseases can best be coordinated, and the field remains nascent in understanding which specific structural governance arrangement will perform best. The present paper contributes to this discussion by demonstrating that it is possible to develop working hypotheses specifying the relationship between the type of infectious disease crisis and type of response to the crisis. For type of crises and type of response mechanisms there is still a lack of research, but the hypothesis combining these two provide a perspective for a future research and action agenda. It certainly prevents us from choosing between schism or hypes when it comes to crisis response. It provides instruments to realize that no single type of response is the most effective and that not all responses are equally effective in a concrete case.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-293
Number of pages19
JournalRisk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

contagious disease
threat
governance
public health
lack

Keywords

  • Infectious Disease
  • Network Governance
  • Outbreak Management
  • Response
  • Typology of Threats

Cite this

Kenis, Patrick ; Schol, Lianne G.C. ; Kraaij-Dirkzwager, Marleen M. ; Timen, Aura. / Appropriate Governance Responses to Infectious Disease Threats : Developing Working Hypotheses. In: Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 275-293.
@article{3de62e0e913b43a69f9a22fcb21d0311,
title = "Appropriate Governance Responses to Infectious Disease Threats: Developing Working Hypotheses",
abstract = "Infectious diseases remain a threat to public health in today's interconnected world. There is an ongoing debate on how responses to threats of infectious diseases can best be coordinated, and the field remains nascent in understanding which specific structural governance arrangement will perform best. The present paper contributes to this discussion by demonstrating that it is possible to develop working hypotheses specifying the relationship between the type of infectious disease crisis and type of response to the crisis. For type of crises and type of response mechanisms there is still a lack of research, but the hypothesis combining these two provide a perspective for a future research and action agenda. It certainly prevents us from choosing between schism or hypes when it comes to crisis response. It provides instruments to realize that no single type of response is the most effective and that not all responses are equally effective in a concrete case.",
keywords = "Infectious Disease, Network Governance, Outbreak Management, Response, Typology of Threats",
author = "Patrick Kenis and Schol, {Lianne G.C.} and Kraaij-Dirkzwager, {Marleen M.} and Aura Timen",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/rhc3.12176",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "275--293",
journal = "Risk, hazards & crisis in public policy",
issn = "1944-4079",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

Appropriate Governance Responses to Infectious Disease Threats : Developing Working Hypotheses. / Kenis, Patrick; Schol, Lianne G.C.; Kraaij-Dirkzwager, Marleen M.; Timen, Aura.

In: Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.09.2019, p. 275-293.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appropriate Governance Responses to Infectious Disease Threats

T2 - Developing Working Hypotheses

AU - Kenis, Patrick

AU - Schol, Lianne G.C.

AU - Kraaij-Dirkzwager, Marleen M.

AU - Timen, Aura

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Infectious diseases remain a threat to public health in today's interconnected world. There is an ongoing debate on how responses to threats of infectious diseases can best be coordinated, and the field remains nascent in understanding which specific structural governance arrangement will perform best. The present paper contributes to this discussion by demonstrating that it is possible to develop working hypotheses specifying the relationship between the type of infectious disease crisis and type of response to the crisis. For type of crises and type of response mechanisms there is still a lack of research, but the hypothesis combining these two provide a perspective for a future research and action agenda. It certainly prevents us from choosing between schism or hypes when it comes to crisis response. It provides instruments to realize that no single type of response is the most effective and that not all responses are equally effective in a concrete case.

AB - Infectious diseases remain a threat to public health in today's interconnected world. There is an ongoing debate on how responses to threats of infectious diseases can best be coordinated, and the field remains nascent in understanding which specific structural governance arrangement will perform best. The present paper contributes to this discussion by demonstrating that it is possible to develop working hypotheses specifying the relationship between the type of infectious disease crisis and type of response to the crisis. For type of crises and type of response mechanisms there is still a lack of research, but the hypothesis combining these two provide a perspective for a future research and action agenda. It certainly prevents us from choosing between schism or hypes when it comes to crisis response. It provides instruments to realize that no single type of response is the most effective and that not all responses are equally effective in a concrete case.

KW - Infectious Disease

KW - Network Governance

KW - Outbreak Management

KW - Response

KW - Typology of Threats

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071746277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071746277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/rhc3.12176

DO - 10.1002/rhc3.12176

M3 - Review article

VL - 10

SP - 275

EP - 293

JO - Risk, hazards & crisis in public policy

JF - Risk, hazards & crisis in public policy

SN - 1944-4079

IS - 3

ER -