TY - JOUR
T1 - Arbitrary social norms influence sex differences in romantic selectivity
T2 - Research article
AU - Finkel, Eli J.
AU - Eastwick, Paul W.
PY - 2009/11/6
Y1 - 2009/11/6
N2 - Men tend to be less selective than women when evaluating and pursuing potential romantic partners. The present experiment employed speed-dating procedures to test a novel explanation for this sex difference: The mere act of physically approaching a potential romantic partner (vs. being approached), a behavior that is more characteristic of men than of women, increases one's attraction to that partner. This hypothesis was supported in a sample of speed daters (N = 350) who attended a heterosexual event where either men (eight events) or women (seven events) rotated from one partner to the next while members of the other sex remained seated. Rotators were significantly less selective than were sitters, which meant that the tendency for men to be less selective than women at events where men rotated disappeared at events where women rotated. These effects were mediated by increased self-confidence among rotators relative to sitters.
AB - Men tend to be less selective than women when evaluating and pursuing potential romantic partners. The present experiment employed speed-dating procedures to test a novel explanation for this sex difference: The mere act of physically approaching a potential romantic partner (vs. being approached), a behavior that is more characteristic of men than of women, increases one's attraction to that partner. This hypothesis was supported in a sample of speed daters (N = 350) who attended a heterosexual event where either men (eight events) or women (seven events) rotated from one partner to the next while members of the other sex remained seated. Rotators were significantly less selective than were sitters, which meant that the tendency for men to be less selective than women at events where men rotated disappeared at events where women rotated. These effects were mediated by increased self-confidence among rotators relative to sitters.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350592073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350592073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02439.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02439.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19754525
AN - SCOPUS:70350592073
VL - 20
SP - 1290
EP - 1295
JO - Psychological science
JF - Psychological science
SN - 0956-7976
IS - 10
ER -