Are All Challenges Equal: Goal Orientations and Their Relationship with Private and Public Challenging Job Experiences

Roy B.L. Sijbom*, Bernd Carette, Nicoletta G. Dimitrova

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study seeks to advance theory on the motivational underpinnings of striving for challenge. We propose and empirically demonstrate that challenging job experiences can be meaningfully subdivided into private challenging job experiences (private challenges) and public challenging job experiences (public challenges). Drawing on achievement goal theory, in a two-wave field study among 226 employees (Study 1) and a multi-source field study among 326 employees (Study 2), we found initial evidence regarding differential effects of employees' mastery-approach goals and performance-approach goals in relation to private challenges and public challenges. Furthermore, Study 2 showed a negative relationship between performance-approach goals and supervisor-rated in-role job performance when public challenges were low. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-43
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Personnel Psychology
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date3 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Hogrefe Publishing.

Keywords

  • challenging experiences
  • employee development
  • job challenge
  • mastery goal orientation
  • performance goal orientation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are All Challenges Equal: Goal Orientations and Their Relationship with Private and Public Challenging Job Experiences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this