Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and electoral consequences of Western European parties' policy shifts

L.J. Ezrow, J. Adams, M. Clark, G. Glasgow

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Do "niche" parties - such as Communist, Green, and extreme nationalist parties - adjust their policies in response to shifts in public opinion Would such policy responsiveness enhance these parties' electoral support We report the results of statistical analyses of the relationship between parties' policy positions, voters' policy preferences, and election outcomes in eight Western European democracies from 1976 to 1998 that suggest that the answer to both questions is no . Specifically, we find no evidence that niche parties responded to shifts in public opinion, while mainstream parties displayed consistent tendencies to respond to public opinion shifts. Furthermore, we find that in situations where niche parties moderated their policy positions they were systematically punished at the polls (a result consistent with the hypothesis that such parties represent extreme or noncentrist ideological clienteles), while mainstream parties did not pay similar electoral penalties. Our findings have important implications for political representation, for spatial models of elections, and for political parties' election strategies. © 2006, Midwest Political Science Association.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)513-529
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

public opinion
election
cause
political science
penalty
democracy
evidence

Cite this

@article{6be60685e4dd4b7aaa3cab8a0c4f4b2c,
title = "Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and electoral consequences of Western European parties' policy shifts",
abstract = "Do {"}niche{"} parties - such as Communist, Green, and extreme nationalist parties - adjust their policies in response to shifts in public opinion Would such policy responsiveness enhance these parties' electoral support We report the results of statistical analyses of the relationship between parties' policy positions, voters' policy preferences, and election outcomes in eight Western European democracies from 1976 to 1998 that suggest that the answer to both questions is no . Specifically, we find no evidence that niche parties responded to shifts in public opinion, while mainstream parties displayed consistent tendencies to respond to public opinion shifts. Furthermore, we find that in situations where niche parties moderated their policy positions they were systematically punished at the polls (a result consistent with the hypothesis that such parties represent extreme or noncentrist ideological clienteles), while mainstream parties did not pay similar electoral penalties. Our findings have important implications for political representation, for spatial models of elections, and for political parties' election strategies. {\circledC} 2006, Midwest Political Science Association.",
author = "L.J. Ezrow and J. Adams and M. Clark and G. Glasgow",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00199.x",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "513--529",
journal = "American Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0092-5853",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and electoral consequences of Western European parties' policy shifts. / Ezrow, L.J.; Adams, J.; Clark, M.; Glasgow, G.

In: American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2006, p. 513-529.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and electoral consequences of Western European parties' policy shifts

AU - Ezrow, L.J.

AU - Adams, J.

AU - Clark, M.

AU - Glasgow, G.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Do "niche" parties - such as Communist, Green, and extreme nationalist parties - adjust their policies in response to shifts in public opinion Would such policy responsiveness enhance these parties' electoral support We report the results of statistical analyses of the relationship between parties' policy positions, voters' policy preferences, and election outcomes in eight Western European democracies from 1976 to 1998 that suggest that the answer to both questions is no . Specifically, we find no evidence that niche parties responded to shifts in public opinion, while mainstream parties displayed consistent tendencies to respond to public opinion shifts. Furthermore, we find that in situations where niche parties moderated their policy positions they were systematically punished at the polls (a result consistent with the hypothesis that such parties represent extreme or noncentrist ideological clienteles), while mainstream parties did not pay similar electoral penalties. Our findings have important implications for political representation, for spatial models of elections, and for political parties' election strategies. © 2006, Midwest Political Science Association.

AB - Do "niche" parties - such as Communist, Green, and extreme nationalist parties - adjust their policies in response to shifts in public opinion Would such policy responsiveness enhance these parties' electoral support We report the results of statistical analyses of the relationship between parties' policy positions, voters' policy preferences, and election outcomes in eight Western European democracies from 1976 to 1998 that suggest that the answer to both questions is no . Specifically, we find no evidence that niche parties responded to shifts in public opinion, while mainstream parties displayed consistent tendencies to respond to public opinion shifts. Furthermore, we find that in situations where niche parties moderated their policy positions they were systematically punished at the polls (a result consistent with the hypothesis that such parties represent extreme or noncentrist ideological clienteles), while mainstream parties did not pay similar electoral penalties. Our findings have important implications for political representation, for spatial models of elections, and for political parties' election strategies. © 2006, Midwest Political Science Association.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00199.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00199.x

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 513

EP - 529

JO - American Journal of Political Science

JF - American Journal of Political Science

SN - 0092-5853

IS - 3

ER -