Are We on the Same Page? Knowledge Boundaries and Transactive Memory System Development in Cross-Functional Teams

J. Kotlarsky, B.J. van den Hooff, L. Houtman

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

One of the key challenges that organizations face when trying to integrate knowledge across different functions is the need to overcome knowledge boundaries between team members. In cross-functional teams, these boundaries, associated with different knowledge backgrounds of people from various disciplines, create communication problems, necessitating team members to engage in complex cognitive processes when integrating knowledge toward a joint outcome. This research investigates the impact of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic knowledge boundaries on a team’s ability to develop a transactive memory system (TMS)—a collective memory system for knowledge coordination in groups. Results from our survey show that syntactic and pragmatic knowledge boundaries negatively affect TMS development. These findings extend TMS theory beyond the information-processing view, which treats knowledge as an object that can be stored and retrieved, to the interpretive and practice-based views of knowledge, which recognize that knowledge (in particular specialized knowledge) is localized, situated, and embedded in practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-344
JournalCommunication Research
Volume42
Issue number3
Early online date26 Dec 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

system development
Data storage equipment
Computer systems
Syntactics
pragmatics
collective memory
System theory
system theory
information processing
Semantics
semantics
communication
Communication
ability
Group
Syntax

Cite this

@article{4c23a55df9234e7aba6f6580266e845b,
title = "Are We on the Same Page? Knowledge Boundaries and Transactive Memory System Development in Cross-Functional Teams",
abstract = "One of the key challenges that organizations face when trying to integrate knowledge across different functions is the need to overcome knowledge boundaries between team members. In cross-functional teams, these boundaries, associated with different knowledge backgrounds of people from various disciplines, create communication problems, necessitating team members to engage in complex cognitive processes when integrating knowledge toward a joint outcome. This research investigates the impact of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic knowledge boundaries on a team’s ability to develop a transactive memory system (TMS)—a collective memory system for knowledge coordination in groups. Results from our survey show that syntactic and pragmatic knowledge boundaries negatively affect TMS development. These findings extend TMS theory beyond the information-processing view, which treats knowledge as an object that can be stored and retrieved, to the interpretive and practice-based views of knowledge, which recognize that knowledge (in particular specialized knowledge) is localized, situated, and embedded in practice.",
author = "J. Kotlarsky and {van den Hooff}, B.J. and L. Houtman",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/0093650212469402",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "319--344",
journal = "Communication Research",
issn = "0093-6502",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Are We on the Same Page? Knowledge Boundaries and Transactive Memory System Development in Cross-Functional Teams. / Kotlarsky, J.; van den Hooff, B.J.; Houtman, L.

In: Communication Research, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2015, p. 319-344.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are We on the Same Page? Knowledge Boundaries and Transactive Memory System Development in Cross-Functional Teams

AU - Kotlarsky, J.

AU - van den Hooff, B.J.

AU - Houtman, L.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - One of the key challenges that organizations face when trying to integrate knowledge across different functions is the need to overcome knowledge boundaries between team members. In cross-functional teams, these boundaries, associated with different knowledge backgrounds of people from various disciplines, create communication problems, necessitating team members to engage in complex cognitive processes when integrating knowledge toward a joint outcome. This research investigates the impact of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic knowledge boundaries on a team’s ability to develop a transactive memory system (TMS)—a collective memory system for knowledge coordination in groups. Results from our survey show that syntactic and pragmatic knowledge boundaries negatively affect TMS development. These findings extend TMS theory beyond the information-processing view, which treats knowledge as an object that can be stored and retrieved, to the interpretive and practice-based views of knowledge, which recognize that knowledge (in particular specialized knowledge) is localized, situated, and embedded in practice.

AB - One of the key challenges that organizations face when trying to integrate knowledge across different functions is the need to overcome knowledge boundaries between team members. In cross-functional teams, these boundaries, associated with different knowledge backgrounds of people from various disciplines, create communication problems, necessitating team members to engage in complex cognitive processes when integrating knowledge toward a joint outcome. This research investigates the impact of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic knowledge boundaries on a team’s ability to develop a transactive memory system (TMS)—a collective memory system for knowledge coordination in groups. Results from our survey show that syntactic and pragmatic knowledge boundaries negatively affect TMS development. These findings extend TMS theory beyond the information-processing view, which treats knowledge as an object that can be stored and retrieved, to the interpretive and practice-based views of knowledge, which recognize that knowledge (in particular specialized knowledge) is localized, situated, and embedded in practice.

U2 - 10.1177/0093650212469402

DO - 10.1177/0093650212469402

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 319

EP - 344

JO - Communication Research

JF - Communication Research

SN - 0093-6502

IS - 3

ER -