Arena: a critical conceptual framework of top management selection

C.J. Vinkenburg, P.G.W. Jansen, N. Dries, R. Pepermans

Abstract

While the selection of top managers is vital to the performance and survival of organizations, the process by which these managers are selected remains uncharted territory. In this conceptual article, we propose that both structural conditions of and the selection process for top management positions are different from those at lower organizational levels. We build on the existing literature on succession, tournament models, and promotion systems to characterize top management selection. The main situational component of this characterization is that of relative versus absolute selection, which leads us to adopt the "arena" as a metaphor and critical framework for top management selection. Finally, we argue that due to certain cognitive features, the arena is an efficient but not necessarily effective selection process, which may contribute to side effects and negative outcomes for organizations. We conclude by setting the agenda for further research on top management selection. © The Author(s) 2013.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-68
JournalGroup and Organization Management
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Cite this

Vinkenburg, C.J.; Jansen, P.G.W.; Dries, N.; Pepermans, R. / Arena: a critical conceptual framework of top management selection.

In: Group and Organization Management, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2014, p. 33-68.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

@article{554dde970348452598c0fb903fb039d8,
title = "Arena: a critical conceptual framework of top management selection",
abstract = "While the selection of top managers is vital to the performance and survival of organizations, the process by which these managers are selected remains uncharted territory. In this conceptual article, we propose that both structural conditions of and the selection process for top management positions are different from those at lower organizational levels. We build on the existing literature on succession, tournament models, and promotion systems to characterize top management selection. The main situational component of this characterization is that of relative versus absolute selection, which leads us to adopt the {"}arena{"} as a metaphor and critical framework for top management selection. Finally, we argue that due to certain cognitive features, the arena is an efficient but not necessarily effective selection process, which may contribute to side effects and negative outcomes for organizations. We conclude by setting the agenda for further research on top management selection. © The Author(s) 2013.",
author = "C.J. Vinkenburg and P.G.W. Jansen and N. Dries and R. Pepermans",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/1059601113492846",
volume = "39",
pages = "33--68",
journal = "Group and Organization Management",
issn = "1059-6011",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Arena: a critical conceptual framework of top management selection. / Vinkenburg, C.J.; Jansen, P.G.W.; Dries, N.; Pepermans, R.

In: Group and Organization Management, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2014, p. 33-68.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arena: a critical conceptual framework of top management selection

AU - Vinkenburg,C.J.

AU - Jansen,P.G.W.

AU - Dries,N.

AU - Pepermans,R.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - While the selection of top managers is vital to the performance and survival of organizations, the process by which these managers are selected remains uncharted territory. In this conceptual article, we propose that both structural conditions of and the selection process for top management positions are different from those at lower organizational levels. We build on the existing literature on succession, tournament models, and promotion systems to characterize top management selection. The main situational component of this characterization is that of relative versus absolute selection, which leads us to adopt the "arena" as a metaphor and critical framework for top management selection. Finally, we argue that due to certain cognitive features, the arena is an efficient but not necessarily effective selection process, which may contribute to side effects and negative outcomes for organizations. We conclude by setting the agenda for further research on top management selection. © The Author(s) 2013.

AB - While the selection of top managers is vital to the performance and survival of organizations, the process by which these managers are selected remains uncharted territory. In this conceptual article, we propose that both structural conditions of and the selection process for top management positions are different from those at lower organizational levels. We build on the existing literature on succession, tournament models, and promotion systems to characterize top management selection. The main situational component of this characterization is that of relative versus absolute selection, which leads us to adopt the "arena" as a metaphor and critical framework for top management selection. Finally, we argue that due to certain cognitive features, the arena is an efficient but not necessarily effective selection process, which may contribute to side effects and negative outcomes for organizations. We conclude by setting the agenda for further research on top management selection. © The Author(s) 2013.

U2 - 10.1177/1059601113492846

DO - 10.1177/1059601113492846

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 33

EP - 68

JO - Group and Organization Management

T2 - Group and Organization Management

JF - Group and Organization Management

SN - 1059-6011

IS - 1

ER -