Arthur Danto, the end of art, and the philosophical view of history

Chiel Van Den Akker*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This essay takes Arthur Danto's end-of-art thesis as a case in point of a substantive philosophy of history. Such philosophy explains the direction that art has taken and why that direction could not have been different. Danto never scrutinized the philosophy of history that his end-of-art thesis presumes. I aim to do that by drawing a distinction between what I refer to as the common view of history and the philosophical view of history, and by arguing that we need the latter if we want to properly assess the plausibility of the end-of-art thesis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-256
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of the Philosophy of History
Volume13
Issue number2
Early online date21 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Aesthetics
  • Art history
  • Arthur Danto
  • End of art
  • Philosophical view of history
  • Substantive philosophy of history

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Arthur Danto, the end of art, and the philosophical view of history'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this