Abstract
Venezuela has long been identified as an area with large methane emissions and intensive oil exploitation, especially in the Lake Maracaibo region, but production has strongly decreased in recent years. The area is notoriously difficult to observe from space due to its complex topography and persistent cloud cover. We use the unprecedented coverage of the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) methane observations in analytical inversions with the Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI) framework at the national scale and at the local scale with the Weather Research and Forecasting model with chemistry (WRF-Chem). In the IMI analysis, we find Venezuelan emissions of 7.5 (5.7-9.3) Tga-1 in 2019, where about half of emissions can be informed by TROPOMI observations, and emissions from oil exploitation are a factor of ∼ 1.6 higher than in bottom-up inventories. Using WRF, we find emissions of 1.2 (1.0-1.5) Tga-1 from the Lake Maracaibo area in 2019, close to bottom-up estimates. Our WRF estimate is ∼ 40 % lower than the result over the same region from the IMI due to differences in the meteorology used by the two models. We find only a small, non-significant trend in emissions between 2018 and 2020 around the lake, implying the area's methane emission intensity expressed against oil and gas production has doubled over the time period, to ∼ 20 %. This value is much higher than what has previously been found for other oil and gas production regions and indicates that there could be large emissions from abandoned infrastructure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 6845-6863 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 11 |
Early online date | 13 Jun 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 Copernicus Publications. All rights reserved.
Funding
This research has been supported by the United Nations Environment Programme (grant no. DTIE20- EN2879). Brian Nathan and Stijn Naus were funded by the UNEP CCAC Methane Studies and the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). Alba Lorente and Tobias Borsdorff were funded by the TROPOMI national program through NSO. Robert J. Parker was funded via the UK National Centre for Earth Observation (grant no. NE/W004895/1). The GOSAT retrievals were supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC grant reference no. NE/X019071/1, \"UK EO Climate Information Service\"). This research has been supported by the United Nations Environment Programme (grant no. DTIE20-EN2879). Brian Nathan and Stijn Naus were funded by the UNEP CCAC Methane Studies and the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). Alba Lorente and Tobias Borsdorff were funded by the TROPOMI national program through NSO. Robert J. Parker was funded via the UK National Centre for Earth Observation (grant no. NE/W004895/1). The GOSAT retrievals were supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC grant reference no. NE/X019071/1, \u201CUK EO Climate Information Service\u201D).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Environmental Defense Fund | |
UK Research and Innovation | |
United Nations Environment Programme | DTIE20-EN2879 |
National Centre for Earth Observation | NE/W004895/1 |
Natural Environment Research Council | NE/X019071/1 |