Assessing the environmental impacts of production- and consumption-side measures in sustainable agriculture intensification in the European Union

Anna Liza Bais-Moleman, Catharina J.E. Schulp, Peter H. Verburg

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Sustainable agricultural intensification (SI) is an important strategy to respond to the combined challenge of achieving food security and providing public goods and ecosystem services to society, including mitigation and adaptation of climate change. Sustainable intensification includes a wide range of measures at both the supply and demand-side of agricultural production. However, currently, it is unclear what are the most effective and priority measures. This study assesses the potential of different SI measures for reducing GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions and increasing land use efficiency in the European Union's agriculture sector. A scenario approach was combined with life cycle analysis to quantify the environmental impacts of a number of different SI measures. The sustainable intensification measures assessed in this study are: 1) changing human diet; 2) using food waste in livestock diets; 3) shifting from monoculture cropping to crop rotation, and, 4) incorporating crop residues into the soil. The results reveal that the studied SI measures have the potential to increase land use savings, ranging from 0.06 to 3.32 m2/person/day, while GHG emission savings ranging from 71 to 1872 g CO2-eq/person/day can be achieved at EU level. Among these SI measures, changing human diet showed a remarkably high reduction of environmental impacts. On the contrary, increased GHG emission savings in the other SI measures (i.e. crop residue incorporation in the field and replacing soybean meal in conventional feed by food waste-based feed) are counter effected by increased GHG emissions in the energy sector due to reduction of feedstock availability for bioenergy production. The approach used in this study allows the assessment of both the production and consumption-side SI measures and allows the identification of the most effective SI measures and their potential trade-offs.

LanguageEnglish
Pages555-567
Number of pages13
JournalGeoderma
Volume338
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

sustainable agricultural intensification
agricultural intensification
alternative agriculture
European Union
environmental impact
greenhouse gas emissions
greenhouse gas
savings
food waste
crop residue
diet
crop residues
land use
agriculture
life cycle analysis
life cycle assessment
food
consumption
supply balance
bioenergy

Keywords

  • Climate change mitigation strategies
  • Greenhouse gas emission savings
  • Human and livestock diet
  • Land use savings
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Sustainable agricultural intensification

Cite this

@article{c6b526aae8a140689bad0fdd332efa42,
title = "Assessing the environmental impacts of production- and consumption-side measures in sustainable agriculture intensification in the European Union",
abstract = "Sustainable agricultural intensification (SI) is an important strategy to respond to the combined challenge of achieving food security and providing public goods and ecosystem services to society, including mitigation and adaptation of climate change. Sustainable intensification includes a wide range of measures at both the supply and demand-side of agricultural production. However, currently, it is unclear what are the most effective and priority measures. This study assesses the potential of different SI measures for reducing GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions and increasing land use efficiency in the European Union's agriculture sector. A scenario approach was combined with life cycle analysis to quantify the environmental impacts of a number of different SI measures. The sustainable intensification measures assessed in this study are: 1) changing human diet; 2) using food waste in livestock diets; 3) shifting from monoculture cropping to crop rotation, and, 4) incorporating crop residues into the soil. The results reveal that the studied SI measures have the potential to increase land use savings, ranging from 0.06 to 3.32 m2/person/day, while GHG emission savings ranging from 71 to 1872 g CO2-eq/person/day can be achieved at EU level. Among these SI measures, changing human diet showed a remarkably high reduction of environmental impacts. On the contrary, increased GHG emission savings in the other SI measures (i.e. crop residue incorporation in the field and replacing soybean meal in conventional feed by food waste-based feed) are counter effected by increased GHG emissions in the energy sector due to reduction of feedstock availability for bioenergy production. The approach used in this study allows the assessment of both the production and consumption-side SI measures and allows the identification of the most effective SI measures and their potential trade-offs.",
keywords = "Climate change mitigation strategies, Greenhouse gas emission savings, Human and livestock diet, Land use savings, Life cycle assessment, Sustainable agricultural intensification",
author = "Bais-Moleman, {Anna Liza} and Schulp, {Catharina J.E.} and Verburg, {Peter H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.042",
language = "English",
volume = "338",
pages = "555--567",
journal = "Geoderma",
issn = "0016-7061",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Assessing the environmental impacts of production- and consumption-side measures in sustainable agriculture intensification in the European Union. / Bais-Moleman, Anna Liza; Schulp, Catharina J.E.; Verburg, Peter H.

In: Geoderma, Vol. 338, 15.03.2019, p. 555-567.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the environmental impacts of production- and consumption-side measures in sustainable agriculture intensification in the European Union

AU - Bais-Moleman, Anna Liza

AU - Schulp, Catharina J.E.

AU - Verburg, Peter H.

PY - 2019/3/15

Y1 - 2019/3/15

N2 - Sustainable agricultural intensification (SI) is an important strategy to respond to the combined challenge of achieving food security and providing public goods and ecosystem services to society, including mitigation and adaptation of climate change. Sustainable intensification includes a wide range of measures at both the supply and demand-side of agricultural production. However, currently, it is unclear what are the most effective and priority measures. This study assesses the potential of different SI measures for reducing GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions and increasing land use efficiency in the European Union's agriculture sector. A scenario approach was combined with life cycle analysis to quantify the environmental impacts of a number of different SI measures. The sustainable intensification measures assessed in this study are: 1) changing human diet; 2) using food waste in livestock diets; 3) shifting from monoculture cropping to crop rotation, and, 4) incorporating crop residues into the soil. The results reveal that the studied SI measures have the potential to increase land use savings, ranging from 0.06 to 3.32 m2/person/day, while GHG emission savings ranging from 71 to 1872 g CO2-eq/person/day can be achieved at EU level. Among these SI measures, changing human diet showed a remarkably high reduction of environmental impacts. On the contrary, increased GHG emission savings in the other SI measures (i.e. crop residue incorporation in the field and replacing soybean meal in conventional feed by food waste-based feed) are counter effected by increased GHG emissions in the energy sector due to reduction of feedstock availability for bioenergy production. The approach used in this study allows the assessment of both the production and consumption-side SI measures and allows the identification of the most effective SI measures and their potential trade-offs.

AB - Sustainable agricultural intensification (SI) is an important strategy to respond to the combined challenge of achieving food security and providing public goods and ecosystem services to society, including mitigation and adaptation of climate change. Sustainable intensification includes a wide range of measures at both the supply and demand-side of agricultural production. However, currently, it is unclear what are the most effective and priority measures. This study assesses the potential of different SI measures for reducing GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions and increasing land use efficiency in the European Union's agriculture sector. A scenario approach was combined with life cycle analysis to quantify the environmental impacts of a number of different SI measures. The sustainable intensification measures assessed in this study are: 1) changing human diet; 2) using food waste in livestock diets; 3) shifting from monoculture cropping to crop rotation, and, 4) incorporating crop residues into the soil. The results reveal that the studied SI measures have the potential to increase land use savings, ranging from 0.06 to 3.32 m2/person/day, while GHG emission savings ranging from 71 to 1872 g CO2-eq/person/day can be achieved at EU level. Among these SI measures, changing human diet showed a remarkably high reduction of environmental impacts. On the contrary, increased GHG emission savings in the other SI measures (i.e. crop residue incorporation in the field and replacing soybean meal in conventional feed by food waste-based feed) are counter effected by increased GHG emissions in the energy sector due to reduction of feedstock availability for bioenergy production. The approach used in this study allows the assessment of both the production and consumption-side SI measures and allows the identification of the most effective SI measures and their potential trade-offs.

KW - Climate change mitigation strategies

KW - Greenhouse gas emission savings

KW - Human and livestock diet

KW - Land use savings

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Sustainable agricultural intensification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059122161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059122161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.042

DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.042

M3 - Article

VL - 338

SP - 555

EP - 567

JO - Geoderma

T2 - Geoderma

JF - Geoderma

SN - 0016-7061

ER -