Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessment of the frequency of reporting dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) in a sample of randomized controlled trials on root coverage procedures

  • Maximilian J. Reuter-Selbach
  • , Naichuan Su
  • , Clovis Mariano Faggion*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Objective: Dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) are important for understanding the impact of proposed therapies on patients’ oral health. The aims of the present study were to investigate the frequency of the reporting of dPROs in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of root coverage procedures and to assess associations between the study/article characteristics and the reporting level of the dPROs. Methods: The PubMed database was searched for RCTs of root coverage procedures in March 16, 2022 and articles published up to March 2022 were included. Information on the types of outcomes and the characteristics of the studies/articles were extracted and reported as frequencies and percentages. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations between the study/article characteristics and the reporting level of dPROs. Results: The search initially identified 387 articles, and after applying the eligibility criteria, 135 articles reporting 135 RCTs were included. A combination of dPROs and non-dPROs was reported in 61.5% of the selected trials, while 37.8% of the trials reported only non-dPROs. Pain or discomfort was the most frequently reported dPRO (n = 58, 43% of the RCTs). More recently published RCTs reported more dPROs. The country of the first author (odds ratio [OR]: 4.39; 95% CI: 1.76-10.95; P <.01), protocol registration (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.16-0.83; P =.02), and RCT type (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17-0.83; P =.02) were significantly associated with the reporting level of the dPROs. Conclusions: Researchers in recent years seem to be paying more attention to the importance of dPROs. RCTs in which the first authors were from developed countries, registered trials, and RCTs with a parallel design were more likely to report dPROs than RCTs with first authors from developing countries, unregistered trials, and RCTs with a split-mouth design.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101793
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Volume23
Issue number1, Supplement
Early online date17 Oct 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
FUNDING: None.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.

Funding

FUNDING: None.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Dentistry
  • Patient outcome assessment
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Periodontics
  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Root coverage procedures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of the frequency of reporting dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) in a sample of randomized controlled trials on root coverage procedures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this