Associations between nutritional frailty and 8-year all-cause mortality in older adults: The Salus in Apulia Study

Roberta Zupo, Fabio Castellana, Vito Guerra, Rossella Donghia, Ilaria Bortone, Chiara Griseta, Luisa Lampignano, Vittorio Dibello, Madia Lozupone, Hélio José Coelho-Júnior, Vincenzo Solfrizzi, Gianluigi Giannelli, Giovanni De Pergola, Heiner Boeing, Rodolfo Sardone*, Francesco Panza

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Preventive nutritional management of frailty, a multidimensional intermediate status in the ageing process, may reduce the risk of adverse health-related outcomes. We investigated the ability of a measure combining physical frailty with nutritional imbalance, defined as nutritional frailty, to predict all-cause mortality over a period of up to 8 years. Methods: We analysed data on 1,943 older adults from the population-based ‘Salus in Apulia Study’. Physical frailty was operationalized using Cardiovascular Health Study criteria and cognitive frailty by combining physical frailty with cognitive impairment. A novel five-item construct was built to assess the extent of nutritional imbalance identified with a machine learning algorithm. Cox models and Kaplan–Meier survival probability analyses of physical frailty, nutritional imbalance (two or more of the following: low body mass index, low skeletal muscle index, ≥2.3 g/day sodium intake, <3.35 g/day potassium intake and <9.9 g/day iron intake), cognitive frailty and the novel nutritional frailty phenotype (physical frailty plus nutritional imbalance) were applied to assess all-cause mortality risk, adjusted for age, sex, education and multimorbidity. Results: The overall prevalence of nutritional frailty was 4.52% (95% confidence interval, CI:3.55–5.44), being more frequent in males. Subjects with nutritional frailty were at higher risk for all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR):2.31; 95%CI:1.41–3.79] than those with physical frailty (HR:1.45,95% CI:1.0–2.02), nutritional imbalance (HR:1.39; 95%CI:1.05–1.83) and cognitive frailty (HR:1.06; 95%CI:0.56–2.01). Conclusions: Efforts to identify, manage and prevent frailty should include the nutritional domain. The nutritional frailty phenotype may highlight major nutritional determinants that could drive survival and health trajectories in older adults.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1071-1082
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Internal Medicine
Volume290
Issue number5
Early online date26 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank the ?Salus in Apulia? Research Team. This manuscript is the result of the research work on frailty undertaken by the ?Italia Longeva: Research Network on Aging? team, supported by the resources of the Italian Ministry of Health?Research Networks of National Health Institutes. We thank the General Practitioners of Castellana Grotte, for their fundamental role in the recruitment of participants to these studies: Cecilia Olga Maria Campanella, Annamaria Daddabbo, Giosu? Dell'aera, Rosalia Francesca Giustiniano, Massimo Guzzoni Iudice, Savino Lomuscio, Rocco Lucarelli, Antonio Mazzarisi, Mariana Palumbo, Maria Teresa Persio, Rosa Vincenza Pesce, Gabriella Puzzovivo, Pasqua Maria Romano, Cinzia Sgobba, Francesco Simeone, Paola Tartaglia and Nicola Tauro.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine

Keywords

  • cognitive frailty
  • frailty
  • nutrition
  • nutritional frailty; physical frailty
  • survival

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Associations between nutritional frailty and 8-year all-cause mortality in older adults: The Salus in Apulia Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this