Attention and distraction in the predictive brain

Heleen A. Slagter; Dirk van Moorselaar

doi:10.1080/13506285.2021.1936733

Attention and distraction in the predictive brain

Heleen A. Slagter^*, Dirk van Moorselaar

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Whether it is possible to ignore a physically salient distractor has been a topic of active debate over the past 25 years, with empirical evidence for and against each of the theoretical stances. We put forward that predictive processing may provide a unified theoretical perspective that can account reasonably well for the empirical literature on attentional capture. In this perspective, capture is a logical consequence of the overall imperative of the brain to predict what sensory signals provide precise information to achieve goal-directed behaviour.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	631-636
Number of pages	6
Journal	Visual Cognition
Volume	29
Issue number	9
Early online date	28 Sept 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2021.1936733
Publication status	Published - 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by European Research Council [(ERC) starting grant (679399)].

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Funding

This work was supported by European Research Council [(ERC) starting grant (679399)].

Funders	Funder number
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme	679399
European Research Council

Keywords

Attentional capture
inhibition
predictive processing
statistical learning
visual search

Access to Document

10.1080/13506285.2021.1936733

Persistent URL (handle)

Copy link address

Cite this

@article{2ae37293bae6487e8cf2c5c52d12ac8a,

title = "Attention and distraction in the predictive brain",

abstract = "Whether it is possible to ignore a physically salient distractor has been a topic of active debate over the past 25 years, with empirical evidence for and against each of the theoretical stances. We put forward that predictive processing may provide a unified theoretical perspective that can account reasonably well for the empirical literature on attentional capture. In this perspective, capture is a logical consequence of the overall imperative of the brain to predict what sensory signals provide precise information to achieve goal-directed behaviour.",

keywords = "Attentional capture, inhibition, predictive processing, statistical learning, visual search",

author = "Slagter, {Heleen A.} and {van Moorselaar}, Dirk",

note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by European Research Council [(ERC) starting grant (679399)]. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1080/13506285.2021.1936733",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "631--636",

journal = "Visual Cognition",

issn = "1350-6285",

publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attention and distraction in the predictive brain

AU - Slagter, Heleen A.

AU - van Moorselaar, Dirk

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by European Research Council [(ERC) starting grant (679399)]. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Whether it is possible to ignore a physically salient distractor has been a topic of active debate over the past 25 years, with empirical evidence for and against each of the theoretical stances. We put forward that predictive processing may provide a unified theoretical perspective that can account reasonably well for the empirical literature on attentional capture. In this perspective, capture is a logical consequence of the overall imperative of the brain to predict what sensory signals provide precise information to achieve goal-directed behaviour.

AB - Whether it is possible to ignore a physically salient distractor has been a topic of active debate over the past 25 years, with empirical evidence for and against each of the theoretical stances. We put forward that predictive processing may provide a unified theoretical perspective that can account reasonably well for the empirical literature on attentional capture. In this perspective, capture is a logical consequence of the overall imperative of the brain to predict what sensory signals provide precise information to achieve goal-directed behaviour.

KW - Attentional capture

KW - inhibition

KW - predictive processing

KW - statistical learning

KW - visual search

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115645242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115645242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13506285.2021.1936733

DO - 10.1080/13506285.2021.1936733

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85115645242

SN - 1350-6285

VL - 29

SP - 631

EP - 636

JO - Visual Cognition

JF - Visual Cognition

IS - 9

ER -

Attention and distraction in the predictive brain

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

Keywords

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this