Abstract
Whether it is possible to ignore a physically salient distractor has been a topic of active debate over the past 25 years, with empirical evidence for and against each of the theoretical stances. We put forward that predictive processing may provide a unified theoretical perspective that can account reasonably well for the empirical literature on attentional capture. In this perspective, capture is a logical consequence of the overall imperative of the brain to predict what sensory signals provide precise information to achieve goal-directed behaviour.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 631-636 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Visual Cognition |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Early online date | 28 Sept 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by European Research Council [(ERC) starting grant (679399)].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Funding
This work was supported by European Research Council [(ERC) starting grant (679399)].
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 679399 |
| European Research Council |
Keywords
- Attentional capture
- inhibition
- predictive processing
- statistical learning
- visual search
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Attention and distraction in the predictive brain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver