Attitudes Towards Adapted Lifestyle-Integrated Functional Exercise Developed for 60-70-Year-Olds: Perceptions of Participants and Trainers

Elisabeth Boulton, Michaela Weber, Helen Hawley-Hague, Ronny Bergquist, Jeanine Van Ancum, Nini H Jonkman, Kristin Taraldsen, Jorunn L Helbostad, Andrea B Maier, Clemens Becker, Chris Todd, Lindy Clemson, Michael Schwenk

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Time commitments, limited access, or unwillingness to join a group are some of the many reasons for low adherence to structured exercise in older adults. A promising alternative approach is integrating exercise into daily routines.

OBJECTIVE: This study tested whether an adapted Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (aLiFE) programme is suitable for adults aged 60-70 years.

METHODS: The aLiFE approach was evaluated by interviews and focus-groups with participants and trainers following 4-week pre-post intervention pilot study. For data analyses, Framework Approach was used. Coding was managed using NVivo, and subsequently organised into overarching themes.

RESULTS: Twenty women and 11 men (mean age 66.4 ± 2.7 years) and 6 trainers (30.0 ± 6.2 years; 5 women) participated. Both participants and trainers were positive about the programme. Participants understood the concept of integrating balance, strength and physical activities into daily lives and valued the individual tailoring in the programme, the preventive approach, and the support of trainers. Trainers valued the flexible approach and peer support between trainers. However, both participants and trainers disliked the extensive study paperwork and reported some challenges to integrate activities into daily routines during the compressed intervention: busy and varied lifestyles, embarrassment performing activities in public, pain, difficulty of specific activities. Participants noted habitualisation of some activities within the short intervention period, even without continuous self-monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS: aLiFE is a highly acceptable intervention amongst adults aged 60-70 years. Trainers are especially relevant as motivators and support providers. The effectiveness of the aLiFE approach should be tested in a randomised controlled trial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalGerontology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Life Style
Exercise
Preventive Health Services
Focus Groups
Randomized Controlled Trials
Interviews
Pain

Bibliographical note

© 2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Cite this

Boulton, Elisabeth ; Weber, Michaela ; Hawley-Hague, Helen ; Bergquist, Ronny ; Van Ancum, Jeanine ; Jonkman, Nini H ; Taraldsen, Kristin ; Helbostad, Jorunn L ; Maier, Andrea B ; Becker, Clemens ; Todd, Chris ; Clemson, Lindy ; Schwenk, Michael. / Attitudes Towards Adapted Lifestyle-Integrated Functional Exercise Developed for 60-70-Year-Olds : Perceptions of Participants and Trainers. In: Gerontology. 2019 ; pp. 1-11.
@article{ac7a2f5b161b4ce38626886a8be46f6f,
title = "Attitudes Towards Adapted Lifestyle-Integrated Functional Exercise Developed for 60-70-Year-Olds: Perceptions of Participants and Trainers",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Time commitments, limited access, or unwillingness to join a group are some of the many reasons for low adherence to structured exercise in older adults. A promising alternative approach is integrating exercise into daily routines.OBJECTIVE: This study tested whether an adapted Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (aLiFE) programme is suitable for adults aged 60-70 years.METHODS: The aLiFE approach was evaluated by interviews and focus-groups with participants and trainers following 4-week pre-post intervention pilot study. For data analyses, Framework Approach was used. Coding was managed using NVivo, and subsequently organised into overarching themes.RESULTS: Twenty women and 11 men (mean age 66.4 ± 2.7 years) and 6 trainers (30.0 ± 6.2 years; 5 women) participated. Both participants and trainers were positive about the programme. Participants understood the concept of integrating balance, strength and physical activities into daily lives and valued the individual tailoring in the programme, the preventive approach, and the support of trainers. Trainers valued the flexible approach and peer support between trainers. However, both participants and trainers disliked the extensive study paperwork and reported some challenges to integrate activities into daily routines during the compressed intervention: busy and varied lifestyles, embarrassment performing activities in public, pain, difficulty of specific activities. Participants noted habitualisation of some activities within the short intervention period, even without continuous self-monitoring.CONCLUSIONS: aLiFE is a highly acceptable intervention amongst adults aged 60-70 years. Trainers are especially relevant as motivators and support providers. The effectiveness of the aLiFE approach should be tested in a randomised controlled trial.",
author = "Elisabeth Boulton and Michaela Weber and Helen Hawley-Hague and Ronny Bergquist and {Van Ancum}, Jeanine and Jonkman, {Nini H} and Kristin Taraldsen and Helbostad, {Jorunn L} and Maier, {Andrea B} and Clemens Becker and Chris Todd and Lindy Clemson and Michael Schwenk",
note = "{\circledC} 2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1159/000500778",
language = "English",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Gerontology",
issn = "0304-324X",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",

}

Boulton, E, Weber, M, Hawley-Hague, H, Bergquist, R, Van Ancum, J, Jonkman, NH, Taraldsen, K, Helbostad, JL, Maier, AB, Becker, C, Todd, C, Clemson, L & Schwenk, M 2019, 'Attitudes Towards Adapted Lifestyle-Integrated Functional Exercise Developed for 60-70-Year-Olds: Perceptions of Participants and Trainers' Gerontology, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500778

Attitudes Towards Adapted Lifestyle-Integrated Functional Exercise Developed for 60-70-Year-Olds : Perceptions of Participants and Trainers. / Boulton, Elisabeth; Weber, Michaela; Hawley-Hague, Helen; Bergquist, Ronny; Van Ancum, Jeanine; Jonkman, Nini H; Taraldsen, Kristin; Helbostad, Jorunn L; Maier, Andrea B; Becker, Clemens; Todd, Chris; Clemson, Lindy; Schwenk, Michael.

In: Gerontology, 19.06.2019, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes Towards Adapted Lifestyle-Integrated Functional Exercise Developed for 60-70-Year-Olds

T2 - Perceptions of Participants and Trainers

AU - Boulton, Elisabeth

AU - Weber, Michaela

AU - Hawley-Hague, Helen

AU - Bergquist, Ronny

AU - Van Ancum, Jeanine

AU - Jonkman, Nini H

AU - Taraldsen, Kristin

AU - Helbostad, Jorunn L

AU - Maier, Andrea B

AU - Becker, Clemens

AU - Todd, Chris

AU - Clemson, Lindy

AU - Schwenk, Michael

N1 - © 2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

PY - 2019/6/19

Y1 - 2019/6/19

N2 - BACKGROUND: Time commitments, limited access, or unwillingness to join a group are some of the many reasons for low adherence to structured exercise in older adults. A promising alternative approach is integrating exercise into daily routines.OBJECTIVE: This study tested whether an adapted Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (aLiFE) programme is suitable for adults aged 60-70 years.METHODS: The aLiFE approach was evaluated by interviews and focus-groups with participants and trainers following 4-week pre-post intervention pilot study. For data analyses, Framework Approach was used. Coding was managed using NVivo, and subsequently organised into overarching themes.RESULTS: Twenty women and 11 men (mean age 66.4 ± 2.7 years) and 6 trainers (30.0 ± 6.2 years; 5 women) participated. Both participants and trainers were positive about the programme. Participants understood the concept of integrating balance, strength and physical activities into daily lives and valued the individual tailoring in the programme, the preventive approach, and the support of trainers. Trainers valued the flexible approach and peer support between trainers. However, both participants and trainers disliked the extensive study paperwork and reported some challenges to integrate activities into daily routines during the compressed intervention: busy and varied lifestyles, embarrassment performing activities in public, pain, difficulty of specific activities. Participants noted habitualisation of some activities within the short intervention period, even without continuous self-monitoring.CONCLUSIONS: aLiFE is a highly acceptable intervention amongst adults aged 60-70 years. Trainers are especially relevant as motivators and support providers. The effectiveness of the aLiFE approach should be tested in a randomised controlled trial.

AB - BACKGROUND: Time commitments, limited access, or unwillingness to join a group are some of the many reasons for low adherence to structured exercise in older adults. A promising alternative approach is integrating exercise into daily routines.OBJECTIVE: This study tested whether an adapted Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (aLiFE) programme is suitable for adults aged 60-70 years.METHODS: The aLiFE approach was evaluated by interviews and focus-groups with participants and trainers following 4-week pre-post intervention pilot study. For data analyses, Framework Approach was used. Coding was managed using NVivo, and subsequently organised into overarching themes.RESULTS: Twenty women and 11 men (mean age 66.4 ± 2.7 years) and 6 trainers (30.0 ± 6.2 years; 5 women) participated. Both participants and trainers were positive about the programme. Participants understood the concept of integrating balance, strength and physical activities into daily lives and valued the individual tailoring in the programme, the preventive approach, and the support of trainers. Trainers valued the flexible approach and peer support between trainers. However, both participants and trainers disliked the extensive study paperwork and reported some challenges to integrate activities into daily routines during the compressed intervention: busy and varied lifestyles, embarrassment performing activities in public, pain, difficulty of specific activities. Participants noted habitualisation of some activities within the short intervention period, even without continuous self-monitoring.CONCLUSIONS: aLiFE is a highly acceptable intervention amongst adults aged 60-70 years. Trainers are especially relevant as motivators and support providers. The effectiveness of the aLiFE approach should be tested in a randomised controlled trial.

U2 - 10.1159/000500778

DO - 10.1159/000500778

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Gerontology

JF - Gerontology

SN - 0304-324X

ER -