Attrition in an online loneliness intervention for adults aged 50 years and older: Survival analysis

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Online interventions can be as effective as in-person interventions. However, attrition in online intervention is high and potentially biases the results. More importantly, high attrition rates might reduce the effectiveness of online interventions. Therefore, it is important to discover the extent to which factors affect adherence to online interventions. The setting for this study is the online Friendship Enrichment Program, a loneliness intervention for adults aged 50 years and older. Objective: This study examined the contribution of severity of loneliness, coping preference, activating content, and engagement in attrition within an online intervention. Methods: Data were collected from 352 participants in an online loneliness intervention for Dutch people aged 50 years and older. Attrition was defined as not completing all 10 intervention lessons. The number of completed lessons was assessed through the management system of the intervention. We tested 4 hypotheses on attrition by applying survival analysis (Cox regression). Results: Of the 352 participants who subscribed to the intervention, 46 never started the introduction. The remaining 306 participants were divided into 2 categories: 73 participants who did not start the lessons of the intervention and 233 who started the lessons of the intervention. Results of the survival analysis (n=233) showed that active coping preference (hazard ratio [HR]=0.73), activating content (HR=0.71), and 2 indicators of engagement (HR=0.94 and HR=0.79) lowered attrition. Severity of loneliness was not related to attrition. Conclusions: To reduce attrition, developers of online (loneliness) interventions may focus on stimulating active behavior within the intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13638
Number of pages10
JournalJMIR Aging
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Loneliness
Survival Analysis

Keywords

  • Attrition
  • Coping
  • Engagement
  • Loneliness
  • Older adults
  • Online intervention

Cite this

@article{0c3e588f97fe4cebb4bf0a5aeb476977,
title = "Attrition in an online loneliness intervention for adults aged 50 years and older: Survival analysis",
abstract = "Background: Online interventions can be as effective as in-person interventions. However, attrition in online intervention is high and potentially biases the results. More importantly, high attrition rates might reduce the effectiveness of online interventions. Therefore, it is important to discover the extent to which factors affect adherence to online interventions. The setting for this study is the online Friendship Enrichment Program, a loneliness intervention for adults aged 50 years and older. Objective: This study examined the contribution of severity of loneliness, coping preference, activating content, and engagement in attrition within an online intervention. Methods: Data were collected from 352 participants in an online loneliness intervention for Dutch people aged 50 years and older. Attrition was defined as not completing all 10 intervention lessons. The number of completed lessons was assessed through the management system of the intervention. We tested 4 hypotheses on attrition by applying survival analysis (Cox regression). Results: Of the 352 participants who subscribed to the intervention, 46 never started the introduction. The remaining 306 participants were divided into 2 categories: 73 participants who did not start the lessons of the intervention and 233 who started the lessons of the intervention. Results of the survival analysis (n=233) showed that active coping preference (hazard ratio [HR]=0.73), activating content (HR=0.71), and 2 indicators of engagement (HR=0.94 and HR=0.79) lowered attrition. Severity of loneliness was not related to attrition. Conclusions: To reduce attrition, developers of online (loneliness) interventions may focus on stimulating active behavior within the intervention.",
keywords = "Attrition, Coping, Engagement, Loneliness, Older adults, Online intervention",
author = "Tamara Bouwman and {Van Tilburg}, Theo and Marja Aartsen",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "24",
doi = "10.2196/13638",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "JMIR Aging",
number = "2",

}

Attrition in an online loneliness intervention for adults aged 50 years and older : Survival analysis. / Bouwman, Tamara; Van Tilburg, Theo; Aartsen, Marja.

In: JMIR Aging, Vol. 2, No. 2, e13638, 24.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attrition in an online loneliness intervention for adults aged 50 years and older

T2 - Survival analysis

AU - Bouwman, Tamara

AU - Van Tilburg, Theo

AU - Aartsen, Marja

PY - 2019/7/24

Y1 - 2019/7/24

N2 - Background: Online interventions can be as effective as in-person interventions. However, attrition in online intervention is high and potentially biases the results. More importantly, high attrition rates might reduce the effectiveness of online interventions. Therefore, it is important to discover the extent to which factors affect adherence to online interventions. The setting for this study is the online Friendship Enrichment Program, a loneliness intervention for adults aged 50 years and older. Objective: This study examined the contribution of severity of loneliness, coping preference, activating content, and engagement in attrition within an online intervention. Methods: Data were collected from 352 participants in an online loneliness intervention for Dutch people aged 50 years and older. Attrition was defined as not completing all 10 intervention lessons. The number of completed lessons was assessed through the management system of the intervention. We tested 4 hypotheses on attrition by applying survival analysis (Cox regression). Results: Of the 352 participants who subscribed to the intervention, 46 never started the introduction. The remaining 306 participants were divided into 2 categories: 73 participants who did not start the lessons of the intervention and 233 who started the lessons of the intervention. Results of the survival analysis (n=233) showed that active coping preference (hazard ratio [HR]=0.73), activating content (HR=0.71), and 2 indicators of engagement (HR=0.94 and HR=0.79) lowered attrition. Severity of loneliness was not related to attrition. Conclusions: To reduce attrition, developers of online (loneliness) interventions may focus on stimulating active behavior within the intervention.

AB - Background: Online interventions can be as effective as in-person interventions. However, attrition in online intervention is high and potentially biases the results. More importantly, high attrition rates might reduce the effectiveness of online interventions. Therefore, it is important to discover the extent to which factors affect adherence to online interventions. The setting for this study is the online Friendship Enrichment Program, a loneliness intervention for adults aged 50 years and older. Objective: This study examined the contribution of severity of loneliness, coping preference, activating content, and engagement in attrition within an online intervention. Methods: Data were collected from 352 participants in an online loneliness intervention for Dutch people aged 50 years and older. Attrition was defined as not completing all 10 intervention lessons. The number of completed lessons was assessed through the management system of the intervention. We tested 4 hypotheses on attrition by applying survival analysis (Cox regression). Results: Of the 352 participants who subscribed to the intervention, 46 never started the introduction. The remaining 306 participants were divided into 2 categories: 73 participants who did not start the lessons of the intervention and 233 who started the lessons of the intervention. Results of the survival analysis (n=233) showed that active coping preference (hazard ratio [HR]=0.73), activating content (HR=0.71), and 2 indicators of engagement (HR=0.94 and HR=0.79) lowered attrition. Severity of loneliness was not related to attrition. Conclusions: To reduce attrition, developers of online (loneliness) interventions may focus on stimulating active behavior within the intervention.

KW - Attrition

KW - Coping

KW - Engagement

KW - Loneliness

KW - Older adults

KW - Online intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071372762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071372762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/13638

DO - 10.2196/13638

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - JMIR Aging

JF - JMIR Aging

IS - 2

M1 - e13638

ER -