Audit committee strength and auditors' risk assessments: The moderating role of CEO narcissism

Yasemin Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu*, Jim Emanuels, Anna Gold, Philip Wallage

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of two elements of the client's control environment on auditor's assessment of the risk of material misstatement: audit committee strength and CEO narcissism, the latter of which is a component of management philosophy, operating style, and tone at the top. We predict and find that auditors' risk assessments are adequately responsive to both elements; however, importantly, a strong audit committee decreases perceived risk assessments only when the client has a CEO with less narcissistic characteristics. In other words, our findings suggest that the presence of narcissistic CEOs' attitudes weakens the perceived audit committee effectiveness, leading auditors to rely less on a strong audit committee. Our findings contribute to the auditing literature by exploring auditors' responses to the complex dynamics between management boards and those charged with governance. From a practical perspective, our results suggest that auditing standards and practice guidance should consider making such complexities and the role of management attitudes and styles even more explicit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)661-674
JournalInternational Journal of Auditing
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We appreciate comments received from Arnold Wright from Northeastern University, Robert Knechel from University of Florida, Chun Keung (Stan) Hoi from Rochester Institute of Technology and participants of the 2019 European Accounting Association Congress (Paphos). This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not‐for‐profit sectors. The conference participation was funded by the School of Management at the University of Groningen.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Auditing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Funding

We appreciate comments received from Arnold Wright from Northeastern University, Robert Knechel from University of Florida, Chun Keung (Stan) Hoi from Rochester Institute of Technology and participants of the 2019 European Accounting Association Congress (Paphos). This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not‐for‐profit sectors. The conference participation was funded by the School of Management at the University of Groningen. We appreciate comments received from Arnold Wright from Northeastern University, Robert Knechel from University of Florida, Chun Keung (Stan) Hoi from Rochester Institute of Technology and participants of the 2019 European Accounting Association Congress (Paphos). This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The conference participation was funded by the School of Management at the University of Groningen.

FundersFunder number
Chun Keung
University of Florida
College of Liberal Arts, Rochester Institute of Technology
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Northeastern University

    Keywords

    • audit committee strength
    • auditor risk assessments
    • CEO narcissism
    • control environment

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Audit committee strength and auditors' risk assessments: The moderating role of CEO narcissism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this