TY - JOUR
T1 - Awareness of possible complications associated with direct composite restorations
T2 - A multinational survey among dentists from 13 countries with meta-analysis
AU - Lehmann, Anna
AU - Nijakowski, Kacper
AU - Jankowski, Jakub
AU - Donnermeyer, David
AU - Palma, Paulo J.
AU - Drobac, Milan
AU - Martins, João Filipe Brochado
AU - Pertek Hatipoğlu, Fatma
AU - Tulegenova, Indira
AU - Javed, Muhammad Qasim
AU - Alharkan, Hamad Mohammad
AU - Bekjanova, Olga
AU - Wyzga, Sylvia
AU - Alkhawas, Moataz Bellah Ahmed Mohamed
AU - Kudenga, Rutendo
AU - Hatipoğlu, Ömer
AU - Surdacka, Anna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Objectives: Resin-based composites (RBCs) evolved into favoured materials for teeth restorations, marking a significant change in dental practice. Despite many advantages, RBCs exhibit various limitations in their physical and chemical properties. Therefore, we assessed the dentists' awareness of possible complications after direct composite restorations and their opinions about this material. Methods: The online questionnaire was created in English in May 2023. A 16-item survey was dedicated to general dentists and specialists. The first section included four questions related to demographic characteristics. The second section comprised twelve questions and focused on awareness of potential side effects of composite restorations, the most crucial advantages and disadvantages of composite resins, and the frequency of experienced clinical complications after the application of composite materials. Results: A total of 1830 dentists from 13 countries took part in the survey. Dentists most often declared awareness of low adhesion to the dentine (77.5 %) and, most rarely, solubility in oral fluids (42.6 %). Aesthetics was identified as the main advantage of composite fillings (79 %), followed by the possibility of repair (59 %) and adhesion to enamel (57 %). Polymerisation shrinkage was a major disadvantage for most countries (70 % overall). Analysing the declared potential clinical complications for all countries, statistically significant findings were obtained for marginal discolouration (OR=2.982, 95 % CI: 1.321–6.730, p-value=0.009) and borderline significance for secondary caries (OR=1.814, 95 % CI: 0.964–3.415, p-value=0.065). Conclusions: Dentists value aesthetics and repairability but are aware of shrinkage and experience discolouration. The issue of toxicity and solubility seems to be the least known to dentists. Clinical significance: Dentists should use RBCs with critical caution due to possible side effects. Despite the undoubted aesthetics of direct composite restorations, it is necessary to remember potential clinical complications such as marginal discolouration or secondary caries.
AB - Objectives: Resin-based composites (RBCs) evolved into favoured materials for teeth restorations, marking a significant change in dental practice. Despite many advantages, RBCs exhibit various limitations in their physical and chemical properties. Therefore, we assessed the dentists' awareness of possible complications after direct composite restorations and their opinions about this material. Methods: The online questionnaire was created in English in May 2023. A 16-item survey was dedicated to general dentists and specialists. The first section included four questions related to demographic characteristics. The second section comprised twelve questions and focused on awareness of potential side effects of composite restorations, the most crucial advantages and disadvantages of composite resins, and the frequency of experienced clinical complications after the application of composite materials. Results: A total of 1830 dentists from 13 countries took part in the survey. Dentists most often declared awareness of low adhesion to the dentine (77.5 %) and, most rarely, solubility in oral fluids (42.6 %). Aesthetics was identified as the main advantage of composite fillings (79 %), followed by the possibility of repair (59 %) and adhesion to enamel (57 %). Polymerisation shrinkage was a major disadvantage for most countries (70 % overall). Analysing the declared potential clinical complications for all countries, statistically significant findings were obtained for marginal discolouration (OR=2.982, 95 % CI: 1.321–6.730, p-value=0.009) and borderline significance for secondary caries (OR=1.814, 95 % CI: 0.964–3.415, p-value=0.065). Conclusions: Dentists value aesthetics and repairability but are aware of shrinkage and experience discolouration. The issue of toxicity and solubility seems to be the least known to dentists. Clinical significance: Dentists should use RBCs with critical caution due to possible side effects. Despite the undoubted aesthetics of direct composite restorations, it is necessary to remember potential clinical complications such as marginal discolouration or secondary caries.
KW - Composite resin
KW - Dental restoration failure
KW - Permanent dental filling
KW - Questionnaire
KW - Side effects
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190840892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85190840892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105009
DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85190840892
SN - 0300-5712
VL - 145
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Journal of dentistry
JF - Journal of dentistry
M1 - 105009
ER -