Abstract
This paper revisits the contact hypothesis by assessing differences in generalized trust among participants of Turkish non-profit organizations and ethnically mixed organizations in Amsterdam. Most voluntary sector research takes the contact hypothesis at its core and assumes that the concentration of ethnic minorities in non-profit organizations is detrimental to learning generalized trust. These studies assume that diversity within organizations is better for developing generalized norms without examining participation in ethnically homogenous organizations. I address this gap in the literature by analysing the variance of generalized trust among organizations and their participants. I achieve this through the analysis of purposively designed survey data. The findings suggest that a contact mechanism at voluntary organizations is problematic and should not be asserted uncritically.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 158-175 |
| Journal | Ethnic and Racial Studies |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Jan 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Back to the Future: revisiting the contact hypothesis at Turkish and mixed non-profit organizations in Amsterdam'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver