Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast implant surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures by plastic surgeons worldwide. However, the relationship between silicone leakage and the most common complication, capsular contracture, is far from understood. This study aimed to compare Baker grade I with Baker grade IV capsules regarding their silicone content in an intradonor setting, using two previously validated imaging techniques. METHODS: Twenty-two donor-matched capsules from 11 patients experiencing unilateral complaints were included after bilateral explantation surgery. All capsules were examined using both stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) imaging and staining with modified oil red O (MORO). Evaluation was done visually for qualitative and semiquantitative assessment and automated for quantitative analysis. RESULTS: Using both SRS and MORO techniques, silicone was found in more Baker grade IV capsules (eight of 11 and 11 of 11, respectively) than in Baker grade I capsules (three of 11 and five of 11, respectively). Baker grade IV capsules also showed significantly more silicone content compared with the Baker grade I capsules. This was true for semiquantitative assessment for both SRS and MORO techniques ( P = 0.019 and P = 0.006, respectively), whereas quantitative analysis proved to be significant for MORO alone ( P = 0.026 versus P = 0.248 for SRS, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a significant correlation between capsule silicone content and capsular contracture is shown. An extensive and continued foreign body response to silicone particles is likely to be responsible. Considering the widespread use of silicone breast implants, these results affect many women worldwide and warrant a more focused research effort. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1191-1200 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Plastic and reconstructive surgery |
Volume | 152 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Funding
This work was supported by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (grant/award no. 654148), Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (grant/award no. 053.21.112), and Health~Holland (grant/award no. TKI 16.01). The authors thank L. van den Broek (Amsterdam UMC; location, VUMC), E. de Miguel (Amsterdam UMC; location, VUMC), and Ine van Raaij (Radboud University Medical Center) for technical assistance; J. F. de Boer (LaserlaB, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) and H. A. Leslie (Department of Environment and Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) for critical feedback on the SRS results; and B. Lissenberg-Witte (Amsterdam UMC; location, VUMC) for assistance with the statistical analysis.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 654148 |
Health~Holland | TKI 16.01 |
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | 053.21.112 |