Behavioral treatment of depression: A meta-analysis of activity scheduling.

P. Cuijpers, A. van Straten, E.H. Warmerdam

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Activity scheduling is a behavioral treatment of depression in which patients learn to monitor their mood and daily activities, and how to increase the number of pleasant activities and to increase positive interactions with their environment. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized effect studies of activity scheduling. Sixteen studies with 780 subjects were included. The pooled effect size indicating the difference between intervention and control conditions at post-test was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.60~1.15). This is a large effect. Heterogeneity was low in all analyses. The comparisons with other psychological treatments at post-test resulted in a non-significant pooled effect size of 0.13 in favor of activity scheduling. In ten studies activity scheduling was compared to cognitive therapy, and the pooled effect size indicating the difference between these two types of treatment was 0.02. The changes from post-test to follow-up for activity scheduling were non-significant, indicating that the benefits of the treatments were retained at follow-up. The differences between activity scheduling and cognitive therapy at follow-up were also non-significant. Activity scheduling is an attractive treatment for depression, not only because it is relatively uncomplicated, time-efficient and does not require complex skills from patients or therapist, but also because this meta-analysis found clear indications that it is effective. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)318-326
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Psychology Review
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Depression
Cognitive Therapy
Therapeutics
Psychology

Cite this

@article{da882b1fcb8242ddb965fd27d7328234,
title = "Behavioral treatment of depression: A meta-analysis of activity scheduling.",
abstract = "Activity scheduling is a behavioral treatment of depression in which patients learn to monitor their mood and daily activities, and how to increase the number of pleasant activities and to increase positive interactions with their environment. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized effect studies of activity scheduling. Sixteen studies with 780 subjects were included. The pooled effect size indicating the difference between intervention and control conditions at post-test was 0.87 (95{\%} CI: 0.60~1.15). This is a large effect. Heterogeneity was low in all analyses. The comparisons with other psychological treatments at post-test resulted in a non-significant pooled effect size of 0.13 in favor of activity scheduling. In ten studies activity scheduling was compared to cognitive therapy, and the pooled effect size indicating the difference between these two types of treatment was 0.02. The changes from post-test to follow-up for activity scheduling were non-significant, indicating that the benefits of the treatments were retained at follow-up. The differences between activity scheduling and cognitive therapy at follow-up were also non-significant. Activity scheduling is an attractive treatment for depression, not only because it is relatively uncomplicated, time-efficient and does not require complex skills from patients or therapist, but also because this meta-analysis found clear indications that it is effective. {\circledC} 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
author = "P. Cuijpers and {van Straten}, A. and E.H. Warmerdam",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1016/j.cpr.2006.11.001",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "318--326",
journal = "Clinical Psychology Review",
issn = "0272-7358",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Behavioral treatment of depression: A meta-analysis of activity scheduling. / Cuijpers, P.; van Straten, A.; Warmerdam, E.H.

In: Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2007, p. 318-326.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral treatment of depression: A meta-analysis of activity scheduling.

AU - Cuijpers, P.

AU - van Straten, A.

AU - Warmerdam, E.H.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Activity scheduling is a behavioral treatment of depression in which patients learn to monitor their mood and daily activities, and how to increase the number of pleasant activities and to increase positive interactions with their environment. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized effect studies of activity scheduling. Sixteen studies with 780 subjects were included. The pooled effect size indicating the difference between intervention and control conditions at post-test was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.60~1.15). This is a large effect. Heterogeneity was low in all analyses. The comparisons with other psychological treatments at post-test resulted in a non-significant pooled effect size of 0.13 in favor of activity scheduling. In ten studies activity scheduling was compared to cognitive therapy, and the pooled effect size indicating the difference between these two types of treatment was 0.02. The changes from post-test to follow-up for activity scheduling were non-significant, indicating that the benefits of the treatments were retained at follow-up. The differences between activity scheduling and cognitive therapy at follow-up were also non-significant. Activity scheduling is an attractive treatment for depression, not only because it is relatively uncomplicated, time-efficient and does not require complex skills from patients or therapist, but also because this meta-analysis found clear indications that it is effective. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Activity scheduling is a behavioral treatment of depression in which patients learn to monitor their mood and daily activities, and how to increase the number of pleasant activities and to increase positive interactions with their environment. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized effect studies of activity scheduling. Sixteen studies with 780 subjects were included. The pooled effect size indicating the difference between intervention and control conditions at post-test was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.60~1.15). This is a large effect. Heterogeneity was low in all analyses. The comparisons with other psychological treatments at post-test resulted in a non-significant pooled effect size of 0.13 in favor of activity scheduling. In ten studies activity scheduling was compared to cognitive therapy, and the pooled effect size indicating the difference between these two types of treatment was 0.02. The changes from post-test to follow-up for activity scheduling were non-significant, indicating that the benefits of the treatments were retained at follow-up. The differences between activity scheduling and cognitive therapy at follow-up were also non-significant. Activity scheduling is an attractive treatment for depression, not only because it is relatively uncomplicated, time-efficient and does not require complex skills from patients or therapist, but also because this meta-analysis found clear indications that it is effective. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.11.001

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 318

EP - 326

JO - Clinical Psychology Review

JF - Clinical Psychology Review

SN - 0272-7358

IS - 3

ER -