Benchmarking flexible meshes and regular grids for large-scale fluvial inundation modelling

Jannis M. Hoch*, Rens van Beek, Hessel C. Winsemius, Marc F.P. Bierkens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Damage resulting from flood events is increasing world-wide, requiring the implementation of mitigation and adaption measures. To facilitate their implementation, it is essential to correctly model flood hazard at the large scale, yet fine spatial resolution. To reduce the computational load of models, flexible meshes are an efficient means compared to uniform regular grids. Yet, thus far they have been applied only for bespoke small-scale studies requiring a high level of a priori grid preparation. To better understand possible advantages as well as shortcomings of their application for large-scale riverine inundation simulations, three different flexible meshes were derived from Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND) data and compared with regular grids under identical spatially explicit hydrologic forcing by using GLOFRIM, a framework for integrated hydrologic-hydrodynamic inundation modelling. By means of GLOFRIM, output from the global hydrologic model PCR-GLOBWB was passed to the hydrodynamic model Delft3D Flexible Mesh. Results show that applying flexible meshes can be beneficial depending on the envisaged purpose. For discharge simulations, similar model accuracy was obtained between flexible and regular grids, with the former generally having shorter run times. For inundation extent simulations, however, the coarser gridding of flexible meshes in upstream areas results in a poorer performance if assessed by contingency maps. Moreover, while the ratio between minimum and maximum spatial resolution of flexible meshes has limited impact on discharge simulations, water level estimates may be stronger influenced by the application of larger grid cells.. As this study presents only a small set of possible realizations, additional research needs to unravel how the data and methods used as well as the choices for discretizations influence model performance. Generally, the application and particularly discretization process of flexible meshes involves more options, bringing more responsibilities for the user. Once an a priori decision is made on the model purpose, flexible meshes can be a valuable addition to modelling approaches where short run times are essential, facilitating large-scale flood simulations, ensemble modelling or operational flood forecasting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)350-360
Number of pages11
JournalAdvances in Water Resources
Volume121
Early online date12 Sept 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Funding

This study was financed by the European Institute of Innovation and Technology Climate-KIC programme under project title “Global high-resolution database of current and future river flood hazard to support planning, adaption and re-insurance”. Furthermore, we kindly thank the German Waterway and Shipping Administration (Wasser- und Schifffahrtsverwaltung des Bundes; WSV) for providing the discharge measurements used for model validation. We also thank Edwin Sutanudjaja for support with PCR-GLOBWB as well as Herman Kernkamp and Arthur van Dam for advice on Delft3D Flexible Mesh. We also thank two anonymous authors for their critical remarks on a previous version of this article.

FundersFunder number
European Institute of Innovation and Technology Climate-KIC
EIT Climate-KIC

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Benchmarking flexible meshes and regular grids for large-scale fluvial inundation modelling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this