Best Practices for Testing the Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preference-Matching

Paul W. Eastwick, Eli J. Finkel, Jeffry A. Simpson

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Many psychological hypotheses require testing whether the similarity between two variables predicts important outcomes. For example, the ideal standards model posits that the match between (A) a participant’s ideal partner preferences, and (B) the traits of a current/potential partner, predicts (C) evaluative outcomes (e.g., the decision to date someone, relationship satisfaction, breakup); tests of the predictive validity of ideal-matching require A × B → C analytic strategies. However, recent articles have incorrectly suggested that documenting a positive samplewide correlation between a participant’s ideals and a current partner’s traits (an A-B correlation) implies that participants pursued, selected, or desired partners with traits that matched their ideals. There are at least six alternative explanations for the emergence of a samplewide A-B correlation; A-B correlations do not provide evidence that ideals guide the selection/evaluation of specific partners. We review appropriately rigorous A × B → C tests that can aid scholars in identifying the circumstances in which ideal-matching exhibits predictive validity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-181
Number of pages15
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Psychology

Keywords

  • close relationships
  • human mating
  • ideals
  • matching hypothesis
  • predictive validity

Cite this

@article{cc2ffd31449e48d883cb700ae7e0960f,
title = "Best Practices for Testing the Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preference-Matching",
abstract = "Many psychological hypotheses require testing whether the similarity between two variables predicts important outcomes. For example, the ideal standards model posits that the match between (A) a participant’s ideal partner preferences, and (B) the traits of a current/potential partner, predicts (C) evaluative outcomes (e.g., the decision to date someone, relationship satisfaction, breakup); tests of the predictive validity of ideal-matching require A × B → C analytic strategies. However, recent articles have incorrectly suggested that documenting a positive samplewide correlation between a participant’s ideals and a current partner’s traits (an A-B correlation) implies that participants pursued, selected, or desired partners with traits that matched their ideals. There are at least six alternative explanations for the emergence of a samplewide A-B correlation; A-B correlations do not provide evidence that ideals guide the selection/evaluation of specific partners. We review appropriately rigorous A × B → C tests that can aid scholars in identifying the circumstances in which ideal-matching exhibits predictive validity.",
keywords = "close relationships, human mating, ideals, matching hypothesis, predictive validity",
author = "Eastwick, {Paul W.} and Finkel, {Eli J.} and Simpson, {Jeffry A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0146167218780689",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "167--181",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Best Practices for Testing the Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preference-Matching. / Eastwick, Paul W.; Finkel, Eli J.; Simpson, Jeffry A.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 167-181.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Best Practices for Testing the Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preference-Matching

AU - Eastwick, Paul W.

AU - Finkel, Eli J.

AU - Simpson, Jeffry A.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Many psychological hypotheses require testing whether the similarity between two variables predicts important outcomes. For example, the ideal standards model posits that the match between (A) a participant’s ideal partner preferences, and (B) the traits of a current/potential partner, predicts (C) evaluative outcomes (e.g., the decision to date someone, relationship satisfaction, breakup); tests of the predictive validity of ideal-matching require A × B → C analytic strategies. However, recent articles have incorrectly suggested that documenting a positive samplewide correlation between a participant’s ideals and a current partner’s traits (an A-B correlation) implies that participants pursued, selected, or desired partners with traits that matched their ideals. There are at least six alternative explanations for the emergence of a samplewide A-B correlation; A-B correlations do not provide evidence that ideals guide the selection/evaluation of specific partners. We review appropriately rigorous A × B → C tests that can aid scholars in identifying the circumstances in which ideal-matching exhibits predictive validity.

AB - Many psychological hypotheses require testing whether the similarity between two variables predicts important outcomes. For example, the ideal standards model posits that the match between (A) a participant’s ideal partner preferences, and (B) the traits of a current/potential partner, predicts (C) evaluative outcomes (e.g., the decision to date someone, relationship satisfaction, breakup); tests of the predictive validity of ideal-matching require A × B → C analytic strategies. However, recent articles have incorrectly suggested that documenting a positive samplewide correlation between a participant’s ideals and a current partner’s traits (an A-B correlation) implies that participants pursued, selected, or desired partners with traits that matched their ideals. There are at least six alternative explanations for the emergence of a samplewide A-B correlation; A-B correlations do not provide evidence that ideals guide the selection/evaluation of specific partners. We review appropriately rigorous A × B → C tests that can aid scholars in identifying the circumstances in which ideal-matching exhibits predictive validity.

KW - close relationships

KW - human mating

KW - ideals

KW - matching hypothesis

KW - predictive validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049856332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049856332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167218780689

DO - 10.1177/0146167218780689

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 167

EP - 181

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 2

ER -