Between controlled co-option and direct election: The current debate on the functioning and composition of the Supervisory Board in the Netherlands

  • Rienk Goodijk*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper first describes the complex Dutch corporate governance system and the functioning of the Supervisory Board under the rules of the structure regime and co-option model up to the present time. The critiques of the parties and stakeholders involved in this model are investigated next, followed by a description and explanation of the recent developments of the Dutch model and a discussion of the pros and cons of the alternatives with regard to the interests of the various stakeholders. Finally, some key factors for improving the boards' functioning in the - changing - Dutch corporate governance system are presented. The findings and recommendations are based on case-studies and interviews conducted in large Dutch companies over several years and on extensive analyses of documents and recent evolutions. This research method however, is only suitable for a process of exploration, clarification and development of hypotheses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-50
Number of pages13
JournalCorporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition
Volume1
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • Board of directors
  • Composition
  • Dutch companies
  • Stakeholders

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Between controlled co-option and direct election: The current debate on the functioning and composition of the Supervisory Board in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this