Abstract
This paper first describes the complex Dutch corporate governance system and the functioning of the Supervisory Board under the rules of the structure regime and co-option model up to the present time. The critiques of the parties and stakeholders involved in this model are investigated next, followed by a description and explanation of the recent developments of the Dutch model and a discussion of the pros and cons of the alternatives with regard to the interests of the various stakeholders. Finally, some key factors for improving the boards' functioning in the - changing - Dutch corporate governance system are presented. The findings and recommendations are based on case-studies and interviews conducted in large Dutch companies over several years and on extensive analyses of documents and recent evolutions. This research method however, is only suitable for a process of exploration, clarification and development of hypotheses.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 38-50 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Keywords
- Board of directors
- Composition
- Dutch companies
- Stakeholders
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Between controlled co-option and direct election: The current debate on the functioning and composition of the Supervisory Board in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver