Beyond Chance? The Persistence of Performance in Online Poker

R.J.D. Potter van Loon, M.J. van den Assem, Dennie van Dolder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A major issue in the widespread controversy about the legality of poker and the appropriate taxation of winnings is whether poker should be considered a game of skill or a game of chance. To inform this debate we present an analysis into the role of skill in the performance of online poker players, using a large database with hundreds of millions of player-hand observations from real money ring games at three different stakes levels. We find that players whose earlier profitability was in the top (bottom) deciles perform better (worse) and are substantially more likely to end up in the top (bottom) performance deciles of the following time period. Regression analyses of performance on historical performance and other skill-related proxies provide further evidence for persistence and predictability. Simulations point out that skill dominates chance when performance is measured over 1,500 or more hands of play.
LanguageEnglish
Pagese0115479
JournalPLoS One
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Taxation
Profitability
hands
Hand
Taxes
taxes
Proxy
profitability
Regression Analysis
Databases

Cite this

@article{1e819b11390c4daca5d6f1a617b53e93,
title = "Beyond Chance? The Persistence of Performance in Online Poker",
abstract = "A major issue in the widespread controversy about the legality of poker and the appropriate taxation of winnings is whether poker should be considered a game of skill or a game of chance. To inform this debate we present an analysis into the role of skill in the performance of online poker players, using a large database with hundreds of millions of player-hand observations from real money ring games at three different stakes levels. We find that players whose earlier profitability was in the top (bottom) deciles perform better (worse) and are substantially more likely to end up in the top (bottom) performance deciles of the following time period. Regression analyses of performance on historical performance and other skill-related proxies provide further evidence for persistence and predictability. Simulations point out that skill dominates chance when performance is measured over 1,500 or more hands of play.",
author = "{Potter van Loon}, R.J.D. and {van den Assem}, M.J. and {van Dolder}, Dennie",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0115479",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "e0115479",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

Beyond Chance? The Persistence of Performance in Online Poker. / Potter van Loon, R.J.D.; van den Assem, M.J.; van Dolder, Dennie.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2015, p. e0115479.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond Chance? The Persistence of Performance in Online Poker

AU - Potter van Loon,R.J.D.

AU - van den Assem,M.J.

AU - van Dolder,Dennie

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - A major issue in the widespread controversy about the legality of poker and the appropriate taxation of winnings is whether poker should be considered a game of skill or a game of chance. To inform this debate we present an analysis into the role of skill in the performance of online poker players, using a large database with hundreds of millions of player-hand observations from real money ring games at three different stakes levels. We find that players whose earlier profitability was in the top (bottom) deciles perform better (worse) and are substantially more likely to end up in the top (bottom) performance deciles of the following time period. Regression analyses of performance on historical performance and other skill-related proxies provide further evidence for persistence and predictability. Simulations point out that skill dominates chance when performance is measured over 1,500 or more hands of play.

AB - A major issue in the widespread controversy about the legality of poker and the appropriate taxation of winnings is whether poker should be considered a game of skill or a game of chance. To inform this debate we present an analysis into the role of skill in the performance of online poker players, using a large database with hundreds of millions of player-hand observations from real money ring games at three different stakes levels. We find that players whose earlier profitability was in the top (bottom) deciles perform better (worse) and are substantially more likely to end up in the top (bottom) performance deciles of the following time period. Regression analyses of performance on historical performance and other skill-related proxies provide further evidence for persistence and predictability. Simulations point out that skill dominates chance when performance is measured over 1,500 or more hands of play.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0115479

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0115479

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - e0115479

JO - PLoS One

T2 - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

ER -