Beyond heterodoxy: Dwight Waldo and the politics-administration dichotomy

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Dwight Waldo (1913-2000) is commonly known as a ‘heterodox’ critic of the dichotomy between politics and administration. But is this reputation supported by his writings? It is primarily based on his early publications, particularly The Administrative State (1948) and The Study of Public Administration (1955), in which he conceptualized politics/administration narrowly as deciding/executing and, indeed, sharply criticized it. Waldo’s later publications, however, offer much broader conceptualizations and a more ambivalent, often even positive appraisal of the politics-administration dichotomy. These are also found in an important unpublished book, on which Waldo worked during several phases of his career. On the basis of these published and unpublished writings, it is necessary to reconsider Waldo’s reputation, and, pursuing his line of thinking, to reconceptualize the politics-administration dichotomy as a layered construct and to reappreciate it as a constitutional doctrine.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-45
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • politics-administration dichotomy
  • Dwight Waldo
  • public administration theory

VU Research Profile

  • Governance for Society

Cite this

@article{695160edf77549279ebe03b63345d27e,
title = "Beyond heterodoxy: Dwight Waldo and the politics-administration dichotomy",
abstract = "Dwight Waldo (1913-2000) is commonly known as a ‘heterodox’ critic of the dichotomy between politics and administration. But is this reputation supported by his writings? It is primarily based on his early publications, particularly The Administrative State (1948) and The Study of Public Administration (1955), in which he conceptualized politics/administration narrowly as deciding/executing and, indeed, sharply criticized it. Waldo’s later publications, however, offer much broader conceptualizations and a more ambivalent, often even positive appraisal of the politics-administration dichotomy. These are also found in an important unpublished book, on which Waldo worked during several phases of his career. On the basis of these published and unpublished writings, it is necessary to reconsider Waldo’s reputation, and, pursuing his line of thinking, to reconceptualize the politics-administration dichotomy as a layered construct and to reappreciate it as a constitutional doctrine.",
keywords = "politics-administration dichotomy, Dwight Waldo, public administration theory",
author = "Patrick Overeem",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00833.x",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "36--45",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley Online Library",
number = "1",

}

Beyond heterodoxy: Dwight Waldo and the politics-administration dichotomy. / Overeem, Patrick.

In: Public Administration Review, Vol. 68, No. 1, 2008, p. 36-45.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond heterodoxy: Dwight Waldo and the politics-administration dichotomy

AU - Overeem, Patrick

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Dwight Waldo (1913-2000) is commonly known as a ‘heterodox’ critic of the dichotomy between politics and administration. But is this reputation supported by his writings? It is primarily based on his early publications, particularly The Administrative State (1948) and The Study of Public Administration (1955), in which he conceptualized politics/administration narrowly as deciding/executing and, indeed, sharply criticized it. Waldo’s later publications, however, offer much broader conceptualizations and a more ambivalent, often even positive appraisal of the politics-administration dichotomy. These are also found in an important unpublished book, on which Waldo worked during several phases of his career. On the basis of these published and unpublished writings, it is necessary to reconsider Waldo’s reputation, and, pursuing his line of thinking, to reconceptualize the politics-administration dichotomy as a layered construct and to reappreciate it as a constitutional doctrine.

AB - Dwight Waldo (1913-2000) is commonly known as a ‘heterodox’ critic of the dichotomy between politics and administration. But is this reputation supported by his writings? It is primarily based on his early publications, particularly The Administrative State (1948) and The Study of Public Administration (1955), in which he conceptualized politics/administration narrowly as deciding/executing and, indeed, sharply criticized it. Waldo’s later publications, however, offer much broader conceptualizations and a more ambivalent, often even positive appraisal of the politics-administration dichotomy. These are also found in an important unpublished book, on which Waldo worked during several phases of his career. On the basis of these published and unpublished writings, it is necessary to reconsider Waldo’s reputation, and, pursuing his line of thinking, to reconceptualize the politics-administration dichotomy as a layered construct and to reappreciate it as a constitutional doctrine.

KW - politics-administration dichotomy

KW - Dwight Waldo

KW - public administration theory

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00833.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00833.x

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 36

EP - 45

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

IS - 1

ER -