Bias in normalization: Causes, consequences, detection and remedies

Reinout Heijungs*, Jeroen B. Guinée, René Kleijn, Vera Rovers

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Introduction. Normalization is an optional step in LCIA that is used to better understand the relative importance and magnitude of the impact category indicator results. It is used for error checking, as a first step in weighting, and for standalone presentation of results. A normalized score for a certain impact category is obtained by determining the ratio of the category indicator result of the product and that of a reference system, such as the world in a certain year or the population of a specific area in a certain year. Biased Normalization. In determining these two quantities, the numerator, the denominator, or both can suffer from incompleteness due to a lack of emission data and/or characterisation factors. This leads to what we call a biased normalization. As a consequence, the normalized category indicator result can be too low or too high. Some examples from hypothetical and real case studies demonstrate this. Consequences of Biased Normalization. Especially when for some impact categories the normalized category indicator result is right, for others too low, and for others too high, severe problems in using normalized scores can show up. It is shown how this may affect the three types of usage of normalized results: error checking, weighting and standalone presentation. Detection and Remedies of Biased Normalization. Some easy checks are proposed that at least alert the LCA practitioner of the possibility of a biased result. These checks are illustrated for an example system on hydrogen production. A number of remedies of this problem is possible. These are discussed. In particular, case-dependent normalization is shown to solve some problems, but on the expense of creating other problems. Discussion. It appears that there is only one good solution: data-bases and tables of characterisation factors must be made more completely, so that the risk of detrimental bias is reduced. On the other hand, the use of the previously introduced checks should become a standard element in LCA practice, and should be facilitated with LCA software.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)211-216
    Number of pages6
    JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
    Volume12
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Keywords

    • Data gaps
    • Hydrogen production
    • LCIA
    • Normalization

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bias in normalization: Causes, consequences, detection and remedies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this