Bilateral police liaison officers: Practices and European policy

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Police from the European Union (EU) Member States make significant use of bilateral liaison officers to cooperate with police in other countries. In the past decades, a number of TREVI and EU Council policy instruments have aimed to enhance the common use of liaison officers by the Member States. This research article discusses these policy instruments from the perspective of the practicalities of the work of liaison officers, examines the underlying rationalities of the instruments and assesses their effects. The findings show that national interests of Member States remain paramount in posting liaison officers. Practices of liaison officers are largely governed by national regulations and organisational particulars, but also depend on the high level of discretion that liaison officers can exercise. In contrast, the policy instruments are largely driven by a political rationality and little intended effect of these instruments can be detected.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)194-210
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Contemporary European Research
Volume6
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

European Policy
police officer
rationality
police
regulation

Cite this

@article{a639ba2f64b041468c4366db9715307b,
title = "Bilateral police liaison officers: Practices and European policy",
abstract = "Police from the European Union (EU) Member States make significant use of bilateral liaison officers to cooperate with police in other countries. In the past decades, a number of TREVI and EU Council policy instruments have aimed to enhance the common use of liaison officers by the Member States. This research article discusses these policy instruments from the perspective of the practicalities of the work of liaison officers, examines the underlying rationalities of the instruments and assesses their effects. The findings show that national interests of Member States remain paramount in posting liaison officers. Practices of liaison officers are largely governed by national regulations and organisational particulars, but also depend on the high level of discretion that liaison officers can exercise. In contrast, the policy instruments are largely driven by a political rationality and little intended effect of these instruments can be detected.",
author = "L. Block",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "194--210",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary European Research",
issn = "1815-347X",
publisher = "UACES",
number = "2",

}

Bilateral police liaison officers: Practices and European policy. / Block, L.

In: Journal of Contemporary European Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2010, p. 194-210.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bilateral police liaison officers: Practices and European policy

AU - Block, L.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Police from the European Union (EU) Member States make significant use of bilateral liaison officers to cooperate with police in other countries. In the past decades, a number of TREVI and EU Council policy instruments have aimed to enhance the common use of liaison officers by the Member States. This research article discusses these policy instruments from the perspective of the practicalities of the work of liaison officers, examines the underlying rationalities of the instruments and assesses their effects. The findings show that national interests of Member States remain paramount in posting liaison officers. Practices of liaison officers are largely governed by national regulations and organisational particulars, but also depend on the high level of discretion that liaison officers can exercise. In contrast, the policy instruments are largely driven by a political rationality and little intended effect of these instruments can be detected.

AB - Police from the European Union (EU) Member States make significant use of bilateral liaison officers to cooperate with police in other countries. In the past decades, a number of TREVI and EU Council policy instruments have aimed to enhance the common use of liaison officers by the Member States. This research article discusses these policy instruments from the perspective of the practicalities of the work of liaison officers, examines the underlying rationalities of the instruments and assesses their effects. The findings show that national interests of Member States remain paramount in posting liaison officers. Practices of liaison officers are largely governed by national regulations and organisational particulars, but also depend on the high level of discretion that liaison officers can exercise. In contrast, the policy instruments are largely driven by a political rationality and little intended effect of these instruments can be detected.

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 194

EP - 210

JO - Journal of Contemporary European Research

JF - Journal of Contemporary European Research

SN - 1815-347X

IS - 2

ER -