(Bio-)Fuel mandating and the green paradox

Samuel J. Okullo*, Frédéric Reynès, Marjan W. Hofkes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Well-intended preannounced carbon mitigation policies can lead to adverse impacts such as the green paradox. This paper examines conditions impacting the prevalence of this phenomenon, when suppliers of carbon-free energy, similarly to carbon suppliers, can anticipate the implementation of preannounced carbon regulation. Neglecting the interim build-up of carbon-free capacity that responds to preannounced climate policies over-estimates the green paradox. For EU-2020 and US-2022 calibrated biofuel mandating targets, simulations point to a robust 0.4–0.6% decline in premandate global crude oil supply, suggesting that concerns over the green paradox may have been overstated. Mandate designs to mitigate the green paradox are also examined. Initially mild targets that are complemented by increasingly stringent ones are more effective at curbing the green paradox than ambitious but delayed targets.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105014
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalEnergy Economics
Volume95
Early online date11 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the NWO’ s ACTS Sustainable Hydrogen Research Program . We thank Jos Bruggink, Reyer Gerlagh, Peter Kruse-Andersen, Karolina Ryszka, Sjak Smulders, Iivo Vehviläinen, and Aart de Zeeuw for helpful comments. Any remaining errors are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020

Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Carbon taxes
  • Climate change
  • Fuel mandates
  • Green paradox
  • Renewable energy subsidies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '(Bio-)Fuel mandating and the green paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this