Biofuels are (not) the future! Legitimation strategies of sustainable ventures in complex institutional environments

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Sustainable ventures often lack legitimacy (perceived to be desirable and appropriate) because various stakeholder groups use contradictory institutions (rules and norms) to make their judgements, which leads to there being fewer resources available and higher failure rates. Using an institutional theory framework and a multi-case research design with 15 biofuel ventures operating in the Netherlands, this study asks how sustainable entrepreneurs attempt to gain legitimacy in these circumstances. Analysis reveals that the entrepreneurs use a combination of rhetorical, reconciliatory and institutional change strategies to obtain legitimacy from different stakeholder groups. These findings further our understanding of sustainable entrepreneurial behavior by revealing how and why different legitimation strategies are used in complex institutional environments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1382
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

biofuel
legitimation
entrepreneur
Biofuels
legitimacy
stakeholder
entrepreneurial behavior
institutional change
research planning
Netherlands
resource
Group
lack
resources
norm
analysis
rate

Keywords

  • Biofuels
  • Institutional embeddedness
  • Institutional entrepreneurship
  • Legitimation strategies
  • Sustainable entrepreneurship

Cite this

@article{33f2f890b9e34e0181787bbb8b49b094,
title = "Biofuels are (not) the future! Legitimation strategies of sustainable ventures in complex institutional environments",
abstract = "Sustainable ventures often lack legitimacy (perceived to be desirable and appropriate) because various stakeholder groups use contradictory institutions (rules and norms) to make their judgements, which leads to there being fewer resources available and higher failure rates. Using an institutional theory framework and a multi-case research design with 15 biofuel ventures operating in the Netherlands, this study asks how sustainable entrepreneurs attempt to gain legitimacy in these circumstances. Analysis reveals that the entrepreneurs use a combination of rhetorical, reconciliatory and institutional change strategies to obtain legitimacy from different stakeholder groups. These findings further our understanding of sustainable entrepreneurial behavior by revealing how and why different legitimation strategies are used in complex institutional environments.",
keywords = "Biofuels, Institutional embeddedness, Institutional entrepreneurship, Legitimation strategies, Sustainable entrepreneurship",
author = "Thompson, {Neil A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.3390/su10051382",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "5",

}

Biofuels are (not) the future! Legitimation strategies of sustainable ventures in complex institutional environments. / Thompson, Neil A.

In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 10, No. 5, 1382, 30.04.2018.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biofuels are (not) the future! Legitimation strategies of sustainable ventures in complex institutional environments

AU - Thompson, Neil A.

PY - 2018/4/30

Y1 - 2018/4/30

N2 - Sustainable ventures often lack legitimacy (perceived to be desirable and appropriate) because various stakeholder groups use contradictory institutions (rules and norms) to make their judgements, which leads to there being fewer resources available and higher failure rates. Using an institutional theory framework and a multi-case research design with 15 biofuel ventures operating in the Netherlands, this study asks how sustainable entrepreneurs attempt to gain legitimacy in these circumstances. Analysis reveals that the entrepreneurs use a combination of rhetorical, reconciliatory and institutional change strategies to obtain legitimacy from different stakeholder groups. These findings further our understanding of sustainable entrepreneurial behavior by revealing how and why different legitimation strategies are used in complex institutional environments.

AB - Sustainable ventures often lack legitimacy (perceived to be desirable and appropriate) because various stakeholder groups use contradictory institutions (rules and norms) to make their judgements, which leads to there being fewer resources available and higher failure rates. Using an institutional theory framework and a multi-case research design with 15 biofuel ventures operating in the Netherlands, this study asks how sustainable entrepreneurs attempt to gain legitimacy in these circumstances. Analysis reveals that the entrepreneurs use a combination of rhetorical, reconciliatory and institutional change strategies to obtain legitimacy from different stakeholder groups. These findings further our understanding of sustainable entrepreneurial behavior by revealing how and why different legitimation strategies are used in complex institutional environments.

KW - Biofuels

KW - Institutional embeddedness

KW - Institutional entrepreneurship

KW - Legitimation strategies

KW - Sustainable entrepreneurship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046119110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046119110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su10051382

DO - 10.3390/su10051382

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 5

M1 - 1382

ER -