Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation

Sven Lautenbach, Anne Christine Mupepele, Carsten F. Dormann, Heera Lee, Stefan Schmidt, Samantha S.K. Scholte, Ralf Seppelt, Astrid J.A. van Teeffelen, Willem Verhagen, Martin Volk

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Ecosystem service research is high on the policy agenda. Strategies to synthesize individual success stories and derive generalized results to provide guidance for policymakers and stakeholder is central to many science-policy initiatives, such as Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. However, generalization requires the documentation of basic information on methods and results of case studies, which might not be present throughout all case studies. We used a quantitative review based on a random sample of studies published in the ISI Web of Knowledge between 1996 and 2016 to identify blind spots in ecosystem service research that might hinder the generalization. We structured our analysis along critical questions about five facets that characterize the holistic ideal of ecosystem services research: (i) social-ecological validity of ecosystem data and models, (ii) consideration of trade-offs between ecosystem services, (iii) recognition of off-site effects, (iv) comprehensive and shrewd involv ement of stakeholders, and (v) relevance and usability of study results for the operationalization of the ecosystem service concept in practice. Results show that these facets were not addressed by the majority of case studies including more recent studies. Clusters of ecosystem services studied together were prone to different blind spots. To effectively operationalize the concept of ecosystem services, the blind spots need to be addressed by upcoming studies. A list of critical questions is provided to raise the awareness of the blind spots both for synthesis of existing knowledge and for future research agendas.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-22
Number of pages22
JournalRegional Environmental Change
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

ecosystem service
stakeholder
biodiversity
ecosystem
site effect
economics
policy

Keywords

  • Good modeling practice
  • Off-site effects
  • Operationalization
  • Quantitative review
  • Stakeholder involvement
  • Trade-offs

Cite this

Lautenbach, S., Mupepele, A. C., Dormann, C. F., Lee, H., Schmidt, S., Scholte, S. S. K., ... Volk, M. (2019). Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation. Regional Environmental Change, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9
Lautenbach, Sven ; Mupepele, Anne Christine ; Dormann, Carsten F. ; Lee, Heera ; Schmidt, Stefan ; Scholte, Samantha S.K. ; Seppelt, Ralf ; van Teeffelen, Astrid J.A. ; Verhagen, Willem ; Volk, Martin. / Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation. In: Regional Environmental Change. 2019 ; pp. 1-22.
@article{f415c6b008f24b8d912e4ca8790dd92a,
title = "Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation",
abstract = "Ecosystem service research is high on the policy agenda. Strategies to synthesize individual success stories and derive generalized results to provide guidance for policymakers and stakeholder is central to many science-policy initiatives, such as Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. However, generalization requires the documentation of basic information on methods and results of case studies, which might not be present throughout all case studies. We used a quantitative review based on a random sample of studies published in the ISI Web of Knowledge between 1996 and 2016 to identify blind spots in ecosystem service research that might hinder the generalization. We structured our analysis along critical questions about five facets that characterize the holistic ideal of ecosystem services research: (i) social-ecological validity of ecosystem data and models, (ii) consideration of trade-offs between ecosystem services, (iii) recognition of off-site effects, (iv) comprehensive and shrewd involv ement of stakeholders, and (v) relevance and usability of study results for the operationalization of the ecosystem service concept in practice. Results show that these facets were not addressed by the majority of case studies including more recent studies. Clusters of ecosystem services studied together were prone to different blind spots. To effectively operationalize the concept of ecosystem services, the blind spots need to be addressed by upcoming studies. A list of critical questions is provided to raise the awareness of the blind spots both for synthesis of existing knowledge and for future research agendas.",
keywords = "Good modeling practice, Off-site effects, Operationalization, Quantitative review, Stakeholder involvement, Trade-offs",
author = "Sven Lautenbach and Mupepele, {Anne Christine} and Dormann, {Carsten F.} and Heera Lee and Stefan Schmidt and Scholte, {Samantha S.K.} and Ralf Seppelt and {van Teeffelen}, {Astrid J.A.} and Willem Verhagen and Martin Volk",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9",
language = "English",
pages = "1--22",
journal = "Regional Environmental Change",
issn = "1436-3798",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Lautenbach, S, Mupepele, AC, Dormann, CF, Lee, H, Schmidt, S, Scholte, SSK, Seppelt, R, van Teeffelen, AJA, Verhagen, W & Volk, M 2019, 'Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation', Regional Environmental Change, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9

Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation. / Lautenbach, Sven; Mupepele, Anne Christine; Dormann, Carsten F.; Lee, Heera; Schmidt, Stefan; Scholte, Samantha S.K.; Seppelt, Ralf; van Teeffelen, Astrid J.A.; Verhagen, Willem; Volk, Martin.

In: Regional Environmental Change, 14.01.2019, p. 1-22.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation

AU - Lautenbach, Sven

AU - Mupepele, Anne Christine

AU - Dormann, Carsten F.

AU - Lee, Heera

AU - Schmidt, Stefan

AU - Scholte, Samantha S.K.

AU - Seppelt, Ralf

AU - van Teeffelen, Astrid J.A.

AU - Verhagen, Willem

AU - Volk, Martin

PY - 2019/1/14

Y1 - 2019/1/14

N2 - Ecosystem service research is high on the policy agenda. Strategies to synthesize individual success stories and derive generalized results to provide guidance for policymakers and stakeholder is central to many science-policy initiatives, such as Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. However, generalization requires the documentation of basic information on methods and results of case studies, which might not be present throughout all case studies. We used a quantitative review based on a random sample of studies published in the ISI Web of Knowledge between 1996 and 2016 to identify blind spots in ecosystem service research that might hinder the generalization. We structured our analysis along critical questions about five facets that characterize the holistic ideal of ecosystem services research: (i) social-ecological validity of ecosystem data and models, (ii) consideration of trade-offs between ecosystem services, (iii) recognition of off-site effects, (iv) comprehensive and shrewd involv ement of stakeholders, and (v) relevance and usability of study results for the operationalization of the ecosystem service concept in practice. Results show that these facets were not addressed by the majority of case studies including more recent studies. Clusters of ecosystem services studied together were prone to different blind spots. To effectively operationalize the concept of ecosystem services, the blind spots need to be addressed by upcoming studies. A list of critical questions is provided to raise the awareness of the blind spots both for synthesis of existing knowledge and for future research agendas.

AB - Ecosystem service research is high on the policy agenda. Strategies to synthesize individual success stories and derive generalized results to provide guidance for policymakers and stakeholder is central to many science-policy initiatives, such as Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. However, generalization requires the documentation of basic information on methods and results of case studies, which might not be present throughout all case studies. We used a quantitative review based on a random sample of studies published in the ISI Web of Knowledge between 1996 and 2016 to identify blind spots in ecosystem service research that might hinder the generalization. We structured our analysis along critical questions about five facets that characterize the holistic ideal of ecosystem services research: (i) social-ecological validity of ecosystem data and models, (ii) consideration of trade-offs between ecosystem services, (iii) recognition of off-site effects, (iv) comprehensive and shrewd involv ement of stakeholders, and (v) relevance and usability of study results for the operationalization of the ecosystem service concept in practice. Results show that these facets were not addressed by the majority of case studies including more recent studies. Clusters of ecosystem services studied together were prone to different blind spots. To effectively operationalize the concept of ecosystem services, the blind spots need to be addressed by upcoming studies. A list of critical questions is provided to raise the awareness of the blind spots both for synthesis of existing knowledge and for future research agendas.

KW - Good modeling practice

KW - Off-site effects

KW - Operationalization

KW - Quantitative review

KW - Stakeholder involvement

KW - Trade-offs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060074255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060074255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9

DO - 10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - Regional Environmental Change

T2 - Regional Environmental Change

JF - Regional Environmental Change

SN - 1436-3798

ER -

Lautenbach S, Mupepele AC, Dormann CF, Lee H, Schmidt S, Scholte SSK et al. Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation. Regional Environmental Change. 2019 Jan 14;1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9