Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between orthostatic hypotension and clinical outcome in older adults is poorly understood. Blood pressure drop rate (ie, speed of blood pressure drop) may particularly reflect the imposed challenge to the baroreflex and the associated clinical outcome (ie, frailty and number of falls). This study aimed to compare orthostatic blood pressure drop rate and drop magnitude with regard to their association with frailty and number of falls. METHODS AND RESULTS: Blood pressure was measured continuously during a standardized active stand task in 168 patients (mean age 81.4±7.0; 55.4% female) who visited a geriatric outpatient clinic for cognitive or mobility problems. The association of orthostatic blood pressure drop rate, blood pressure drop magnitude, and baroreflex sensitivity (ie, increase in heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure drop magnitude) with frailty (Fried criteria and 4 frailty markers) and self-reported number of falls was assessed using linear regression models, adjusting for age and sex. Systolic blood pressure drop rate had the strongest association with frailty according to the 4 frailty markers (β 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11–0.49; P=0.003) and number of falls (β 1.09; 95% CI, 0.19–1.20; P=0.018); diastolic blood pressure drop magnitude was most strongly associated with frailty according to the Fried criteria (β 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15–0.60; P<0.001). Baroreflex sensitivity was associated with neither frailty nor number of falls. CONCLUSIONS: Orthostatic blood pressure drop rate was associated with frailty and falls and may reflect the challenge to the baroreflex rather than drop magnitude.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e014688 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-23 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Journal of the American Heart Association |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 7 |
Early online date | 30 Mar 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 9 Apr 2020 |
Funding
This study has received funding from the perspective grant (NeuroCIMT, No. 14901) of the Applied and Engineering Sciences, which is part of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO, Utrecht, the Netherlands), and which is partly funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs. Furthermore, this study was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programs PreventIT (No. 689238) and PANINI (No. 675003). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | |
Ministerie van Economische Zaken | |
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programs PreventIT | |
PANINI | |
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 689238, 675003 |