Bonding behavior of restorative materials in primary teeth submitted to erosive challenge − Evidence from an in vitro study

T. Kerber Tedesco; A.F. Bissoto Calvo; L. Yoshioka; C. Calil Bonifácio; C.J. Kleverlaan; A.C. Volpi Mello-Moura; D. Prócida Raggio

doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.005

Bonding behavior of restorative materials in primary teeth submitted to erosive challenge − Evidence from an in vitro study

T. Kerber Tedesco, A.F. Bissoto Calvo, L. Yoshioka, C. Calil Bonifácio, C.J. Kleverlaan, A.C. Volpi Mello-Moura, D. Prócida Raggio

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate bond stability of restorative materials to eroded primary teeth after aging.

Methods: 120 primary molars were assigned into 12 groups, in according to substrate – enamel or dentin, precondition of substrate – sound or eroded, and restorative material – resin composite/adhesive system-RC, high-viscosity glass ionomer cement–HVGIC or resin-modified GIC–RMGIC. Eroded groups were subjected to erosive challenge prior to bonding procedures. Polyethylene tubes were placed on flat surfaces of substrates and filled up with one of materials. After 24 h, half of the specimens were submitted to microshear bond strength (BS) test, and the other half after 12 months.

Results: Generally, sound substrates resulted in higher BS values than eroded ones, with exception of HVGIC that obtained similar performance in both substrates. Furthermore, the storage period negatively influenced BS values for RC groups on dentin assessment. The other groups did not show reduction in BS values after 12 months. RC showed better bonding performance than others materials.

Conclusion: Previously eroded substrates result in the worst performance of RC and RMGIC. Moreover, the water storage affects the bonding stability of RC to dentin. On the other hand, HVGIC is not affected by precondition of substrate neither storage.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	130-137
Number of pages	8
Journal	International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
Volume	85
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.005
Publication status	Published - Oct 2018

Funding

We would like to thank CAPES – Ciências Sem Fronteiras 2115-13-1 and, CNPq 141486/2014-7 for financial support.

Funders	Funder number
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico	141486/2014-7

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.005

Persistent URL (handle)

Copy link address

Cite this

Kerber Tedesco, T., Bissoto Calvo, A. F., Yoshioka, L., Calil Bonifácio, C., Kleverlaan, C. J., Volpi Mello-Moura, A. C., & Prócida Raggio, D. (2018). Bonding behavior of restorative materials in primary teeth submitted to erosive challenge − Evidence from an in vitro study. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 85, 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.005

@article{13da57ad3cf04557916b079c1d0d3beb,

title = "Bonding behavior of restorative materials in primary teeth submitted to erosive challenge − Evidence from an in vitro study",

abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate bond stability of restorative materials to eroded primary teeth after aging. Methods: 120 primary molars were assigned into 12 groups, in according to substrate – enamel or dentin, precondition of substrate – sound or eroded, and restorative material – resin composite/adhesive system-RC, high-viscosity glass ionomer cement–HVGIC or resin-modified GIC–RMGIC. Eroded groups were subjected to erosive challenge prior to bonding procedures. Polyethylene tubes were placed on flat surfaces of substrates and filled up with one of materials. After 24 h, half of the specimens were submitted to microshear bond strength (BS) test, and the other half after 12 months. Results: Generally, sound substrates resulted in higher BS values than eroded ones, with exception of HVGIC that obtained similar performance in both substrates. Furthermore, the storage period negatively influenced BS values for RC groups on dentin assessment. The other groups did not show reduction in BS values after 12 months. RC showed better bonding performance than others materials. Conclusion: Previously eroded substrates result in the worst performance of RC and RMGIC. Moreover, the water storage affects the bonding stability of RC to dentin. On the other hand, HVGIC is not affected by precondition of substrate neither storage.",

author = "{Kerber Tedesco}, T. and {Bissoto Calvo}, A.F. and L. Yoshioka and {Calil Bonif{\'a}cio}, C. and C.J. Kleverlaan and {Volpi Mello-Moura}, A.C. and {Pr{\'o}cida Raggio}, D.",

year = "2018",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.005",

language = "English",

volume = "85",

pages = "130--137",

journal = "International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives",

issn = "0143-7496",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

Kerber Tedesco, T, Bissoto Calvo, AF, Yoshioka, L, Calil Bonifácio, C , Kleverlaan, CJ, Volpi Mello-Moura, AC & Prócida Raggio, D 2018, 'Bonding behavior of restorative materials in primary teeth submitted to erosive challenge − Evidence from an in vitro study', International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 85, pp. 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.005

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bonding behavior of restorative materials in primary teeth submitted to erosive challenge − Evidence from an in vitro study

AU - Kerber Tedesco, T.

AU - Bissoto Calvo, A.F.

AU - Yoshioka, L.

AU - Calil Bonifácio, C.

AU - Kleverlaan, C.J.

AU - Volpi Mello-Moura, A.C.

AU - Prócida Raggio, D.

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate bond stability of restorative materials to eroded primary teeth after aging. Methods: 120 primary molars were assigned into 12 groups, in according to substrate – enamel or dentin, precondition of substrate – sound or eroded, and restorative material – resin composite/adhesive system-RC, high-viscosity glass ionomer cement–HVGIC or resin-modified GIC–RMGIC. Eroded groups were subjected to erosive challenge prior to bonding procedures. Polyethylene tubes were placed on flat surfaces of substrates and filled up with one of materials. After 24 h, half of the specimens were submitted to microshear bond strength (BS) test, and the other half after 12 months. Results: Generally, sound substrates resulted in higher BS values than eroded ones, with exception of HVGIC that obtained similar performance in both substrates. Furthermore, the storage period negatively influenced BS values for RC groups on dentin assessment. The other groups did not show reduction in BS values after 12 months. RC showed better bonding performance than others materials. Conclusion: Previously eroded substrates result in the worst performance of RC and RMGIC. Moreover, the water storage affects the bonding stability of RC to dentin. On the other hand, HVGIC is not affected by precondition of substrate neither storage.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate bond stability of restorative materials to eroded primary teeth after aging. Methods: 120 primary molars were assigned into 12 groups, in according to substrate – enamel or dentin, precondition of substrate – sound or eroded, and restorative material – resin composite/adhesive system-RC, high-viscosity glass ionomer cement–HVGIC or resin-modified GIC–RMGIC. Eroded groups were subjected to erosive challenge prior to bonding procedures. Polyethylene tubes were placed on flat surfaces of substrates and filled up with one of materials. After 24 h, half of the specimens were submitted to microshear bond strength (BS) test, and the other half after 12 months. Results: Generally, sound substrates resulted in higher BS values than eroded ones, with exception of HVGIC that obtained similar performance in both substrates. Furthermore, the storage period negatively influenced BS values for RC groups on dentin assessment. The other groups did not show reduction in BS values after 12 months. RC showed better bonding performance than others materials. Conclusion: Previously eroded substrates result in the worst performance of RC and RMGIC. Moreover, the water storage affects the bonding stability of RC to dentin. On the other hand, HVGIC is not affected by precondition of substrate neither storage.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.005

M3 - Article

SN - 0143-7496

VL - 85

SP - 130

EP - 137

JO - International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives

JF - International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives

ER -

Bonding behavior of restorative materials in primary teeth submitted to erosive challenge − Evidence from an in vitro study

Abstract

Funding

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Fingerprint

Cite this