Abstract
Visions help to understand common ground and tensions among citizens and stakeholders, supporting inclusive land management and conservation solutions to the climate emergency and biodiversity crisis. With careful design and sufficient resource, it is possible to bring together communities and other stakeholders to share perspectives and deliberate desired futures, identifying more acceptable alternatives and avoiding costly delays. We evaluated researcher and participant experiences of illustration-based interviews to understand land management visions using four studies in Scotland, The Netherlands and Spain. These studies used STREAMLINE, a visual mixed-method interview format using thematic illustrated canvases designed to provide an inclusive and creative framing for participants to contemplate their desired future. Participants enjoyed the informal visual format, which reduced pressure, increased comfort through the research process, and helped their thinking and reflection about complex topics. They also valued being listened to and having the opportunity to share their views. Researchers appreciated the ability to triangulate rich qualitative data with a variety of quantitative measure through the mixed-method format and the flexibility to adapt the canvases to suit their research aims. Positive participant experience made facilitation easier and was stimulating for the researchers. The credibility and legitimacy of illustration-based interviews will ultimately depend on specific research design-decisions and testing, which can make the approach more resource intensive than conventional interviews. While organisational barriers should be considered realistically, illustration-based interviews can have high saliency by providing useful and usable insights that strengthen land management policy and planning.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 104862 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-11 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Landscape and Urban Planning |
Volume | 239 |
Early online date | 9 Aug 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We are grateful to all participants who took part in the STREAMLINE interviews for their time and enthusiasm. We thank to Sam Hubbard and Scriberia for creating the illustrations. Chris Raymond, Peter Verburg, Miguel Cebrián Piqueres, and Ciska Ulug contributed to stimulating discussions about the manuscript. The development of STREAMLINE and the Inner Forth case-study were funded by funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2012-308393-2 (OPERAs). The Perthshire case-study was funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2010-265104 (VOLANTE). The Kromme Rijn and Sierra de Guadarama case-studies were part of the ENVISION project, funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Grant PCI2018-092958 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number: 01LC18064), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), National Science Foundation, United States (NSF), and National Park Service, United States (NPS).
Funding Information:
We are grateful to all participants who took part in the STREAMLINE interviews for their time and enthusiasm. We thank to Sam Hubbard and Scriberia for creating the illustrations. Chris Raymond, Peter Verburg, Miguel Cebrián Piqueres, and Ciska Ulug contributed to stimulating discussions about the manuscript. The development of STREAMLINE and the Inner Forth case-study were funded by funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2012-308393-2 (OPERAs). The Perthshire case-study was funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2010-265104 (VOLANTE). The Kromme Rijn and Sierra de Guadarama case-studies were part of the ENVISION project, funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Grant PCI2018-092958 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number: 01LC18064), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), National Science Foundation, United States (NSF), and National Park Service, United States (NPS).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
Funding
We are grateful to all participants who took part in the STREAMLINE interviews for their time and enthusiasm. We thank to Sam Hubbard and Scriberia for creating the illustrations. Chris Raymond, Peter Verburg, Miguel Cebrián Piqueres, and Ciska Ulug contributed to stimulating discussions about the manuscript. The development of STREAMLINE and the Inner Forth case-study were funded by funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2012-308393-2 (OPERAs). The Perthshire case-study was funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2010-265104 (VOLANTE). The Kromme Rijn and Sierra de Guadarama case-studies were part of the ENVISION project, funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Grant PCI2018-092958 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number: 01LC18064), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), National Science Foundation, United States (NSF), and National Park Service, United States (NPS). We are grateful to all participants who took part in the STREAMLINE interviews for their time and enthusiasm. We thank to Sam Hubbard and Scriberia for creating the illustrations. Chris Raymond, Peter Verburg, Miguel Cebrián Piqueres, and Ciska Ulug contributed to stimulating discussions about the manuscript. The development of STREAMLINE and the Inner Forth case-study were funded by funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2012-308393-2 (OPERAs). The Perthshire case-study was funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2010-265104 (VOLANTE). The Kromme Rijn and Sierra de Guadarama case-studies were part of the ENVISION project, funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Grant PCI2018-092958 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number: 01LC18064), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), National Science Foundation, United States (NSF), and National Park Service, United States (NPS).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Swedish research council for sustainable development | |
National Science Foundation | |
Ciska Ulug | |
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | |
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas | |
National Park Service | |
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung | 01LC18064 |
European Commission | MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, FP7-ENV-2010-265104, FP7-ENV-2012-308393-2, PCI2018-092958 |
Seventh Framework Programme | 265104, 308393 |
Keywords
- Governance
- Inclusive Conservation
- Participatory methods
- Participatory planning
- Visions
- Visual methods