‘Bonkers but good!’ – Using illustration-based interview methods to understand land management and conservation visions

Marc J. Metzger*, Rose Keller, Veronica Lo, Anna Filyushkina, Franziska Komossa, Maria D. López-Rodríguez, Christiane Valluri, Aster De Vries Lentsch

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Visions help to understand common ground and tensions among citizens and stakeholders, supporting inclusive land management and conservation solutions to the climate emergency and biodiversity crisis. With careful design and sufficient resource, it is possible to bring together communities and other stakeholders to share perspectives and deliberate desired futures, identifying more acceptable alternatives and avoiding costly delays. We evaluated researcher and participant experiences of illustration-based interviews to understand land management visions using four studies in Scotland, The Netherlands and Spain. These studies used STREAMLINE, a visual mixed-method interview format using thematic illustrated canvases designed to provide an inclusive and creative framing for participants to contemplate their desired future. Participants enjoyed the informal visual format, which reduced pressure, increased comfort through the research process, and helped their thinking and reflection about complex topics. They also valued being listened to and having the opportunity to share their views. Researchers appreciated the ability to triangulate rich qualitative data with a variety of quantitative measure through the mixed-method format and the flexibility to adapt the canvases to suit their research aims. Positive participant experience made facilitation easier and was stimulating for the researchers. The credibility and legitimacy of illustration-based interviews will ultimately depend on specific research design-decisions and testing, which can make the approach more resource intensive than conventional interviews. While organisational barriers should be considered realistically, illustration-based interviews can have high saliency by providing useful and usable insights that strengthen land management policy and planning.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104862
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume239
Early online date9 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We are grateful to all participants who took part in the STREAMLINE interviews for their time and enthusiasm. We thank to Sam Hubbard and Scriberia for creating the illustrations. Chris Raymond, Peter Verburg, Miguel Cebrián Piqueres, and Ciska Ulug contributed to stimulating discussions about the manuscript. The development of STREAMLINE and the Inner Forth case-study were funded by funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2012-308393-2 (OPERAs). The Perthshire case-study was funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2010-265104 (VOLANTE). The Kromme Rijn and Sierra de Guadarama case-studies were part of the ENVISION project, funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Grant PCI2018-092958 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number: 01LC18064), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), National Science Foundation, United States (NSF), and National Park Service, United States (NPS).

Funding Information:
We are grateful to all participants who took part in the STREAMLINE interviews for their time and enthusiasm. We thank to Sam Hubbard and Scriberia for creating the illustrations. Chris Raymond, Peter Verburg, Miguel Cebrián Piqueres, and Ciska Ulug contributed to stimulating discussions about the manuscript. The development of STREAMLINE and the Inner Forth case-study were funded by funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2012-308393-2 (OPERAs). The Perthshire case-study was funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2010-265104 (VOLANTE). The Kromme Rijn and Sierra de Guadarama case-studies were part of the ENVISION project, funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Grant PCI2018-092958 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number: 01LC18064), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), National Science Foundation, United States (NSF), and National Park Service, United States (NPS).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)

Funding

We are grateful to all participants who took part in the STREAMLINE interviews for their time and enthusiasm. We thank to Sam Hubbard and Scriberia for creating the illustrations. Chris Raymond, Peter Verburg, Miguel Cebrián Piqueres, and Ciska Ulug contributed to stimulating discussions about the manuscript. The development of STREAMLINE and the Inner Forth case-study were funded by funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2012-308393-2 (OPERAs). The Perthshire case-study was funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2010-265104 (VOLANTE). The Kromme Rijn and Sierra de Guadarama case-studies were part of the ENVISION project, funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Grant PCI2018-092958 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number: 01LC18064), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), National Science Foundation, United States (NSF), and National Park Service, United States (NPS). We are grateful to all participants who took part in the STREAMLINE interviews for their time and enthusiasm. We thank to Sam Hubbard and Scriberia for creating the illustrations. Chris Raymond, Peter Verburg, Miguel Cebrián Piqueres, and Ciska Ulug contributed to stimulating discussions about the manuscript. The development of STREAMLINE and the Inner Forth case-study were funded by funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2012-308393-2 (OPERAs). The Perthshire case-study was funded by the European Commission FP7 under Grant Agreement FP7-ENV-2010-265104 (VOLANTE). The Kromme Rijn and Sierra de Guadarama case-studies were part of the ENVISION project, funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Grant PCI2018-092958 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number: 01LC18064), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), National Science Foundation, United States (NSF), and National Park Service, United States (NPS).

FundersFunder number
Swedish research council for sustainable development
National Science Foundation
Ciska Ulug
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
National Park Service
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung01LC18064
European CommissionMCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, FP7-ENV-2010-265104, FP7-ENV-2012-308393-2, PCI2018-092958
Seventh Framework Programme265104, 308393

    Keywords

    • Governance
    • Inclusive Conservation
    • Participatory methods
    • Participatory planning
    • Visions
    • Visual methods

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '‘Bonkers but good!’ – Using illustration-based interview methods to understand land management and conservation visions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this