Abstract
This article contributes a boundary work analysis of the case of acid mine drainage (AMD) in South Africa to the existing boundary work literature. We conduct our analysis by applying a synthesized multi-level boundary work framework to examine whether the knowledge that was produced during the boundary work conducted was usable and influential in decision-making and resulted in successful policy implementation. We conclude that contrary to expectations, a closed, technocratic boundary work process resulted in the relatively successful implementation of a short-term intervention in the AMD problem, whereas a subsequent open and deliberative process did not result in the successful implementation of the long-term policy solution. We ascribe this finding to the influence of critical enabling and constraining factors characterizing the South African socio-political context within which the AMD issue is situated, and therefore, we recommend adding a meta-analytical layer to boundary work analyses, especially in developing country contexts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 393-405 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Science and Public Policy |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 12 Dec 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press.
Keywords
- acid mine drainage
- boundary work
- science-policy interface
- South Africa