Boundary work to what end? Analysing the acid mine drainage case in Gauteng, South Africa

Nikki Funke*, Dave Huitema, Arthur Petersen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article contributes a boundary work analysis of the case of acid mine drainage (AMD) in South Africa to the existing boundary work literature. We conduct our analysis by applying a synthesized multi-level boundary work framework to examine whether the knowledge that was produced during the boundary work conducted was usable and influential in decision-making and resulted in successful policy implementation. We conclude that contrary to expectations, a closed, technocratic boundary work process resulted in the relatively successful implementation of a short-term intervention in the AMD problem, whereas a subsequent open and deliberative process did not result in the successful implementation of the long-term policy solution. We ascribe this finding to the influence of critical enabling and constraining factors characterizing the South African socio-political context within which the AMD issue is situated, and therefore, we recommend adding a meta-analytical layer to boundary work analyses, especially in developing country contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-405
Number of pages13
JournalScience and Public Policy
Volume51
Issue number3
Early online date12 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press.

Keywords

  • acid mine drainage
  • boundary work
  • science-policy interface
  • South Africa

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Boundary work to what end? Analysing the acid mine drainage case in Gauteng, South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this