Abstract
One of the areas in which brain-based mind reading (BMR) may be applied is forensic psychiatry. The purpose of this paper is to identify opportunities and challenges for forensic psychiatry regarding BMR. In order to do so, a conceptual framework for BMR will be introduced, which distinguishes between three basic types of BMR, based on how they relate to the subject's knowledge. In addition, three features of BMR techniques will be articulated: first, whether they require passive cooperation; second, whether they require active cooperation; and third, whether they require that the subject is awake. Each of the types of BMR entails specific chances and risks for forensic psychiatry, involving, for example, confidentiality in the doctor–patient relationship and the possibility of coercive use of BMR techniques. It will be concluded that apart from legal considerations, such as tests of admissibility of evidence, professional ethics is highly relevant.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 311-329 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Law and the Biosciences |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- brain imaging
- forensic psychiatry
- legal insanity
- lie detection
- mind reading
- neurolaw
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Brain-based mind reading in forensic psychiatry: exploring possibilities and perils'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver