Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis

  • Laura Jacxsens*
  • , Joke De Pauw
  • , Emilie Cardon
  • , Annemarie van der Wal
  • , Laure Jacquemin
  • , Annick Gilles
  • , Sarah Michiels
  • , Vincent Van Rompaey
  • , Marc J.W. Lammers
  • , Willem De Hertogh
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Accumulating evidence suggests a role of the brainstem in tinnitus generation and modulation. Several studies in chronic tinnitus patients have reported latency and amplitude changes of the different peaks of the auditory brainstem response, possibly reflecting neural changes or altered activity. The aim of the systematic review was to assess if alterations within the brainstem of chronic tinnitus patients are reflected in short- and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Methods: A systematic review was performed and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating short- and middle-latency AEPs in tinnitus patients and controls were included. Two independent reviewers conducted the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Meta-analysis was performed using a multivariate meta-analytic model. Results: Twenty-seven cross-sectional studies were included. Multivariate meta-analysis revealed that in tinnitus patients with normal hearing, significantly longer latencies of auditory brainstem response (ABR) waves I (SMD = 0.66 ms, p < 0.001), III (SMD = 0.43 ms, p < 0.001), and V (SMD = 0.47 ms, p < 0.01) are present. The results regarding possible changes in middle-latency responses (MLRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) were inconclusive. Discussion: The discovered changes in short-latency AEPs reflect alterations at brainstem level in tinnitus patients. More specifically, the prolonged ABR latencies could possibly be explained by high frequency sensorineural hearing loss, or other modulating factors such as cochlear synaptopathy or somatosensory tinnitus generators. The question whether middle-latency AEP changes, representing subcortical level of the auditory pathway, are present in tinnitus still remains unanswered. Future studies should identify and correctly deal with confounding factors, such as age, gender and the presence of somatosensory tinnitus components. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021243687, PROSPERO [CRD42021243687].

Original languageEnglish
Article number941876
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalFrontiers in Neurology
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
A preprint of this manuscript has been published on MedRxiv (https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.29.22270068] (88).

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Jacxsens, De Pauw, Cardon, van der Wal, Jacquemin, Gilles, Michiels, Van Rompaey, Lammers and De Hertogh.

Funding

A preprint of this manuscript has been published on MedRxiv (https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.29.22270068] (88).

Keywords

  • auditory brainstem responses (ABRs)
  • auditory evoked potentials
  • brainstem
  • frequency-following responses (FFRs)
  • middle-latency responses (MLRs)
  • systematic review
  • tinnitus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this