Abstract
Choice of an appropriate branding strategy is a critical determinant of new product success. Prior work on fast-moving-consumer-goods (FMCG) prescribes that new products carry new (vs. existing) brand names to appeal to earlier adopters - a critical target for new products. However, such a prescription may not be prudent for high-technology (HT) products, as they often involve considerably more consumer perceived risk than FMCG. By drawing on Dowling and Staelin's (1994) framework of perceived-risk handling, we propose that both earlier and later adopters will favor existing brands to cope with the elevated risk associated with an innovative HT product. Two studies - one conducted in an experimental setting and the other in a field setting - support the proposition that both earlier and later adopters respond more favorably to existing (vs. new) brands on innovative HT products.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 85-91 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of Business Research |
| Volume | 70 |
| Early online date | 30 Jul 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Branding Strategies for High Technology Products: The Effects of Consumer and Product Innovativeness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver