Bridging the gap between the near and the far: Displacement and representation

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article discusses the use of proximal deictic expressions to designate distal entities, focusing on the use of the present tense to designate past events. Cognitive approaches to this issue assume that such usages presuppose a special conceptual construal, in which the spatio-temporal distance between the ground and the designated event space is bridged in some way. In this paper, I argue that there are two distinct ways in which this may be accomplished. One is through mentally displacing the ground to the distal space, so that the designated events become proximal in relation to this alternative ground. The other involves bringing the distal space into the ground in the form of a representation. I describe the distinctive characteristics of the two scenarios, showing both where they converge and at what point the difference becomes relevant for linguistic analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-350
Number of pages24
JournalCognitive Linguistics
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

Linguistics
event
scenario
linguistics
Distal
Proximal

Keywords

  • deixis
  • historical present
  • past+now construction
  • tense
  • viewpoint

Cite this

@article{359bc13c699f40c79420a5eb1846a79c,
title = "Bridging the gap between the near and the far: Displacement and representation",
abstract = "This article discusses the use of proximal deictic expressions to designate distal entities, focusing on the use of the present tense to designate past events. Cognitive approaches to this issue assume that such usages presuppose a special conceptual construal, in which the spatio-temporal distance between the ground and the designated event space is bridged in some way. In this paper, I argue that there are two distinct ways in which this may be accomplished. One is through mentally displacing the ground to the distal space, so that the designated events become proximal in relation to this alternative ground. The other involves bringing the distal space into the ground in the form of a representation. I describe the distinctive characteristics of the two scenarios, showing both where they converge and at what point the difference becomes relevant for linguistic analysis.",
keywords = "deixis, historical present, past+now construction, tense, viewpoint",
author = "Nijk, {Arjan A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/cog-2018-0042",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "327--350",
journal = "Cognitive Linguistics",
issn = "0936-5907",
publisher = "De Gruyter Mouton",
number = "2",

}

Bridging the gap between the near and the far : Displacement and representation. / Nijk, Arjan A.

In: Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.05.2019, p. 327-350.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridging the gap between the near and the far

T2 - Displacement and representation

AU - Nijk, Arjan A.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - This article discusses the use of proximal deictic expressions to designate distal entities, focusing on the use of the present tense to designate past events. Cognitive approaches to this issue assume that such usages presuppose a special conceptual construal, in which the spatio-temporal distance between the ground and the designated event space is bridged in some way. In this paper, I argue that there are two distinct ways in which this may be accomplished. One is through mentally displacing the ground to the distal space, so that the designated events become proximal in relation to this alternative ground. The other involves bringing the distal space into the ground in the form of a representation. I describe the distinctive characteristics of the two scenarios, showing both where they converge and at what point the difference becomes relevant for linguistic analysis.

AB - This article discusses the use of proximal deictic expressions to designate distal entities, focusing on the use of the present tense to designate past events. Cognitive approaches to this issue assume that such usages presuppose a special conceptual construal, in which the spatio-temporal distance between the ground and the designated event space is bridged in some way. In this paper, I argue that there are two distinct ways in which this may be accomplished. One is through mentally displacing the ground to the distal space, so that the designated events become proximal in relation to this alternative ground. The other involves bringing the distal space into the ground in the form of a representation. I describe the distinctive characteristics of the two scenarios, showing both where they converge and at what point the difference becomes relevant for linguistic analysis.

KW - deixis

KW - historical present

KW - past+now construction

KW - tense

KW - viewpoint

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066078190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066078190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/cog-2018-0042

DO - 10.1515/cog-2018-0042

M3 - Review article

VL - 30

SP - 327

EP - 350

JO - Cognitive Linguistics

JF - Cognitive Linguistics

SN - 0936-5907

IS - 2

ER -