Bringing the sharing-sparing debate down to the ground: Lessons learnt for participatory scenario development

N. Hagemann; E. H. van der Zanden; B. A. Willaarts; A. Holzkämper; M. Volk; C. Rutz; J. A. Priess; M. Schönhart

doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104262

Bringing the sharing-sparing debate down to the ground: Lessons learnt for participatory scenario development

N. Hagemann^*, E. H. van der Zanden, B. A. Willaarts, A. Holzkämper, M. Volk, C. Rutz, J. A. Priess, M. Schönhart

^*Corresponding author for this work

Environmental Geography

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

The concepts of Land Sharing (LSH) and Land Sparing (LSP) shall help to manage trade-offs between land use and biodiversity conservation but applications in real world contexts are scarce. We review the literature on scenario and stakeholder processes and present a participatory approach to translate the LSH/LSP concept into practice. It is based on a scenario definition process harmonized across five case studies in Europe and resulted in semi-quantitative participative LSH and LSP scenarios. Harmonization eases comparability among case studies despite fundamentally different scenarios due to heterogeneous conditions across the regions. A key challenge was the right level of standardization for the scenario process to reach a common understanding across case study regions while acknowledging regional peculiarities. The resulting scenarios support for regional specific planning recommendations and can be input to quantitative ecosystem service and biodiversity models.

Original language	English
Article number	104262
Pages (from-to)	1-10
Number of pages	10
Journal	Land Use Policy
Volume	91
Early online date	27 Nov 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104262
Publication status	Published - 1 Feb 2020

Funding

This research was funded through the 2013–2014 BiodivERsA/FACCE-JPI joint call for research proposals, with the national funders The Austrian Science Fund (FWF; I 2046-B25), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Förderkennzeichen 01LC1404), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (PCIN- 2014-080) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (40FA40_158391). The authors would like to thank the patient and supportive reviewer who put exceptional efforts in his/her reviews to improve this paper. Furthermore, we thank all stakeholders of the project for their input and the discussions. Appendix A

Funders	Funder number
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung	40FA40_158391
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung	01LC1404
Austrian Science Fund	I 2046-B25
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España	PCIN- 2014-080

Keywords

Case studies
Land management
Land sharing
Land sparing
Participatory scenarios
Transdisciplinary

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104262

Persistent URL (handle)

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{fc482aaffe4c44b88842314f93c9fb90,

title = "Bringing the sharing-sparing debate down to the ground: Lessons learnt for participatory scenario development",

abstract = "The concepts of Land Sharing (LSH) and Land Sparing (LSP) shall help to manage trade-offs between land use and biodiversity conservation but applications in real world contexts are scarce. We review the literature on scenario and stakeholder processes and present a participatory approach to translate the LSH/LSP concept into practice. It is based on a scenario definition process harmonized across five case studies in Europe and resulted in semi-quantitative participative LSH and LSP scenarios. Harmonization eases comparability among case studies despite fundamentally different scenarios due to heterogeneous conditions across the regions. A key challenge was the right level of standardization for the scenario process to reach a common understanding across case study regions while acknowledging regional peculiarities. The resulting scenarios support for regional specific planning recommendations and can be input to quantitative ecosystem service and biodiversity models.",

keywords = "Case studies, Land management, Land sharing, Land sparing, Participatory scenarios, Transdisciplinary",

author = "N. Hagemann and \{van der Zanden\}, \{E. H.\} and Willaarts, \{B. A.\} and A. Holzk{\"a}mper and M. Volk and C. Rutz and Priess, \{J. A.\} and M. Sch{\"o}nhart",

year = "2020",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104262",

language = "English",

volume = "91",

pages = "1--10",

journal = "Land Use Policy",

issn = "0264-8377",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bringing the sharing-sparing debate down to the ground

T2 - Lessons learnt for participatory scenario development

AU - Hagemann, N.

AU - van der Zanden, E. H.

AU - Willaarts, B. A.

AU - Holzkämper, A.

AU - Volk, M.

AU - Rutz, C.

AU - Priess, J. A.

AU - Schönhart, M.

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - The concepts of Land Sharing (LSH) and Land Sparing (LSP) shall help to manage trade-offs between land use and biodiversity conservation but applications in real world contexts are scarce. We review the literature on scenario and stakeholder processes and present a participatory approach to translate the LSH/LSP concept into practice. It is based on a scenario definition process harmonized across five case studies in Europe and resulted in semi-quantitative participative LSH and LSP scenarios. Harmonization eases comparability among case studies despite fundamentally different scenarios due to heterogeneous conditions across the regions. A key challenge was the right level of standardization for the scenario process to reach a common understanding across case study regions while acknowledging regional peculiarities. The resulting scenarios support for regional specific planning recommendations and can be input to quantitative ecosystem service and biodiversity models.

AB - The concepts of Land Sharing (LSH) and Land Sparing (LSP) shall help to manage trade-offs between land use and biodiversity conservation but applications in real world contexts are scarce. We review the literature on scenario and stakeholder processes and present a participatory approach to translate the LSH/LSP concept into practice. It is based on a scenario definition process harmonized across five case studies in Europe and resulted in semi-quantitative participative LSH and LSP scenarios. Harmonization eases comparability among case studies despite fundamentally different scenarios due to heterogeneous conditions across the regions. A key challenge was the right level of standardization for the scenario process to reach a common understanding across case study regions while acknowledging regional peculiarities. The resulting scenarios support for regional specific planning recommendations and can be input to quantitative ecosystem service and biodiversity models.

KW - Case studies

KW - Land management

KW - Land sharing

KW - Land sparing

KW - Participatory scenarios

KW - Transdisciplinary

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85075840560

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075840560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104262

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104262

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075840560

SN - 0264-8377

VL - 91

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

M1 - 104262

ER -

Bringing the sharing-sparing debate down to the ground: Lessons learnt for participatory scenario development

Abstract

Funding

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this