Building Capabilities for Alliance Portfolios

K. Heimerks, E. Klijn, J.J. Reuer

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article analyses how firms build their capabilities for alliance portfolios. We investigate different solutions that are adopted across portfolio sizes, and whether the adoption of these solutions explains alliance portfolio performance. Our findings illustrate which solutions practitioners should consider implementing when expanding their alliance portfolio, and which can help enhance their portfolio performance. Our conclusions are based on a sample of 192 firms managing over 3,400 strategic alliances and seven expert interviews. We analyse the adoption of 14 distinct alliance practices in four solution categories. Our results reveal whether and when functional and staffing (e.g. alliance manager, alliance department), tool-based (e.g. intranet, codification of best practices), training (e.g. in-house, external training) and third party (e.g. consultant, mediators) solutions help firms transition successfully between small, medium, and large alliance portfolios, and to what extent they are associated with alliance success. Rules of engagement for successful alliance portfolio management are discussed. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-114
JournalLong Range Planning
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

firm
portfolio management
Intranet
staffing
best practice
performance
expert
manager
interview
Alliance portfolios
Alliances
Portfolio performance
strategic alliance
codification

Cite this

@article{b17769931bf74af79b0cf9312c880246,
title = "Building Capabilities for Alliance Portfolios",
abstract = "This article analyses how firms build their capabilities for alliance portfolios. We investigate different solutions that are adopted across portfolio sizes, and whether the adoption of these solutions explains alliance portfolio performance. Our findings illustrate which solutions practitioners should consider implementing when expanding their alliance portfolio, and which can help enhance their portfolio performance. Our conclusions are based on a sample of 192 firms managing over 3,400 strategic alliances and seven expert interviews. We analyse the adoption of 14 distinct alliance practices in four solution categories. Our results reveal whether and when functional and staffing (e.g. alliance manager, alliance department), tool-based (e.g. intranet, codification of best practices), training (e.g. in-house, external training) and third party (e.g. consultant, mediators) solutions help firms transition successfully between small, medium, and large alliance portfolios, and to what extent they are associated with alliance success. Rules of engagement for successful alliance portfolio management are discussed. {\circledC} 2008 Elsevier Ltd.",
author = "K. Heimerks and E. Klijn and J.J. Reuer",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.lrp.2008.10.005",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "96--114",
journal = "Long Range Planning",
issn = "0024-6301",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

Building Capabilities for Alliance Portfolios. / Heimerks, K.; Klijn, E.; Reuer, J.J.

In: Long Range Planning, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2009, p. 96-114.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building Capabilities for Alliance Portfolios

AU - Heimerks, K.

AU - Klijn, E.

AU - Reuer, J.J.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This article analyses how firms build their capabilities for alliance portfolios. We investigate different solutions that are adopted across portfolio sizes, and whether the adoption of these solutions explains alliance portfolio performance. Our findings illustrate which solutions practitioners should consider implementing when expanding their alliance portfolio, and which can help enhance their portfolio performance. Our conclusions are based on a sample of 192 firms managing over 3,400 strategic alliances and seven expert interviews. We analyse the adoption of 14 distinct alliance practices in four solution categories. Our results reveal whether and when functional and staffing (e.g. alliance manager, alliance department), tool-based (e.g. intranet, codification of best practices), training (e.g. in-house, external training) and third party (e.g. consultant, mediators) solutions help firms transition successfully between small, medium, and large alliance portfolios, and to what extent they are associated with alliance success. Rules of engagement for successful alliance portfolio management are discussed. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd.

AB - This article analyses how firms build their capabilities for alliance portfolios. We investigate different solutions that are adopted across portfolio sizes, and whether the adoption of these solutions explains alliance portfolio performance. Our findings illustrate which solutions practitioners should consider implementing when expanding their alliance portfolio, and which can help enhance their portfolio performance. Our conclusions are based on a sample of 192 firms managing over 3,400 strategic alliances and seven expert interviews. We analyse the adoption of 14 distinct alliance practices in four solution categories. Our results reveal whether and when functional and staffing (e.g. alliance manager, alliance department), tool-based (e.g. intranet, codification of best practices), training (e.g. in-house, external training) and third party (e.g. consultant, mediators) solutions help firms transition successfully between small, medium, and large alliance portfolios, and to what extent they are associated with alliance success. Rules of engagement for successful alliance portfolio management are discussed. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd.

U2 - 10.1016/j.lrp.2008.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.lrp.2008.10.005

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 96

EP - 114

JO - Long Range Planning

JF - Long Range Planning

SN - 0024-6301

IS - 1

ER -