Building collaboration? Co-location and territoriality in a railway control center

T.A.H. Willems, A.H. van Marrewijk

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper studies the design of co-located spaces and how organizational actors experience such spaces. The literature on co-location is ambiguous about how reduced physical distance increases collaboration. To address this problem, we draw on an ethnographic study of a co-located railway control center, housing the largest Dutch railway organizations under one roof. Although the intention of the co-location was to improve collaboration by bringing different organizations into closer proximity, our findings tell a different story. Railway employees developed several territorial practices (preserving existing boundaries, creating new boundaries, and the situational use of boundaries) through which they resisted the design of the control center, thereby changing the control center from co-located to “dis-located.” We argue that understanding the relationship between co-location and collaboration should not only focus on how such spaces are designed but, rather, account for how spaces where collaboration is demanded are experienced and used by employees.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)542-554
Number of pages14
JournalRevista de Administracao de Empresas
Volume57
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Personnel
Roofs
Territoriality
Railway
Co-location
Employees
Proximity

Cite this

@article{9526ba2aacdf4b2da33d01429828fca2,
title = "Building collaboration? Co-location and territoriality in a railway control center",
abstract = "This paper studies the design of co-located spaces and how organizational actors experience such spaces. The literature on co-location is ambiguous about how reduced physical distance increases collaboration. To address this problem, we draw on an ethnographic study of a co-located railway control center, housing the largest Dutch railway organizations under one roof. Although the intention of the co-location was to improve collaboration by bringing different organizations into closer proximity, our findings tell a different story. Railway employees developed several territorial practices (preserving existing boundaries, creating new boundaries, and the situational use of boundaries) through which they resisted the design of the control center, thereby changing the control center from co-located to “dis-located.” We argue that understanding the relationship between co-location and collaboration should not only focus on how such spaces are designed but, rather, account for how spaces where collaboration is demanded are experienced and used by employees.",
author = "T.A.H. Willems and {van Marrewijk}, A.H.",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1590/s0034-759020170603",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "542--554",
journal = "Revista de Administracao de Empresas",
issn = "0034-7590",
publisher = "Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo",
number = "6",

}

Building collaboration? Co-location and territoriality in a railway control center. / Willems, T.A.H.; van Marrewijk, A.H.

In: Revista de Administracao de Empresas, Vol. 57, No. 6, 01.12.2017, p. 542-554.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building collaboration? Co-location and territoriality in a railway control center

AU - Willems, T.A.H.

AU - van Marrewijk, A.H.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - This paper studies the design of co-located spaces and how organizational actors experience such spaces. The literature on co-location is ambiguous about how reduced physical distance increases collaboration. To address this problem, we draw on an ethnographic study of a co-located railway control center, housing the largest Dutch railway organizations under one roof. Although the intention of the co-location was to improve collaboration by bringing different organizations into closer proximity, our findings tell a different story. Railway employees developed several territorial practices (preserving existing boundaries, creating new boundaries, and the situational use of boundaries) through which they resisted the design of the control center, thereby changing the control center from co-located to “dis-located.” We argue that understanding the relationship between co-location and collaboration should not only focus on how such spaces are designed but, rather, account for how spaces where collaboration is demanded are experienced and used by employees.

AB - This paper studies the design of co-located spaces and how organizational actors experience such spaces. The literature on co-location is ambiguous about how reduced physical distance increases collaboration. To address this problem, we draw on an ethnographic study of a co-located railway control center, housing the largest Dutch railway organizations under one roof. Although the intention of the co-location was to improve collaboration by bringing different organizations into closer proximity, our findings tell a different story. Railway employees developed several territorial practices (preserving existing boundaries, creating new boundaries, and the situational use of boundaries) through which they resisted the design of the control center, thereby changing the control center from co-located to “dis-located.” We argue that understanding the relationship between co-location and collaboration should not only focus on how such spaces are designed but, rather, account for how spaces where collaboration is demanded are experienced and used by employees.

UR - http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rae/v57n6/0034-7590-rae-57-06-0542.pdf

U2 - 10.1590/s0034-759020170603

DO - 10.1590/s0034-759020170603

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 542

EP - 554

JO - Revista de Administracao de Empresas

JF - Revista de Administracao de Empresas

SN - 0034-7590

IS - 6

ER -