Cambodian higher education in transition: an institutional governance perspective

Chanphirun Sam

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The paper aims to ascertain the governance arrangements of higher education providers in Cambodia and to seek insights into institutional governance while its higher education sector is in a significant transition towards the market model. Design/methodology/approach: The empirical research underpinning this paper applies a qualitative method, based on an interpretivist approach to inquiry. The study uses semi-structured interviews with 38 key research participants from relevant institutions. The data analysis follows a thematic coding approach. Findings: The study has found that despite their divergent governance arrangements, three forms of higher education providers – public institution, public administrative institution and private institution – have become increasingly similar because of their convergent trend towards commercialization and politicization. These two critical issues are considered threats to institutional development in Cambodia. Research limitations/implications: The interviews were conducted with the key actors at leadership and management levels. This leaves room for future research to investigate the institutional governance issue at faculty and student levels to develop a deeper understanding about the on-the-ground implementation. This paper is a useful information source for policymakers, institutional leaders and educational practitioners. Originality/value: This paper addresses the under-researched issue of institutional governance in Cambodia and critically examines the assumption that devolution and privatization of higher education in Cambodia will help advance the sector for economic development. The paper contributes to the ongoing academic debate in the higher education domain while higher education institutions are struggling to sustain their place in the competitive marketplace.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)414-434
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Enterprising Communities
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Governance
Cambodia
Structured interview
Privatization
Education
Design methodology
Qualitative methods
Devolution
Institutional development
Public institutions
Politicization
Higher education institutions
Market model
Economic development
Information sources
Threat
Empirical research
Politicians
Commercialization

Keywords

  • Autonomy
  • Board
  • Institutional governance
  • Privatization
  • Reform

Cite this

@article{c0fe68902f164b6b85bf12f05da6a56a,
title = "Cambodian higher education in transition: an institutional governance perspective",
abstract = "Purpose: The paper aims to ascertain the governance arrangements of higher education providers in Cambodia and to seek insights into institutional governance while its higher education sector is in a significant transition towards the market model. Design/methodology/approach: The empirical research underpinning this paper applies a qualitative method, based on an interpretivist approach to inquiry. The study uses semi-structured interviews with 38 key research participants from relevant institutions. The data analysis follows a thematic coding approach. Findings: The study has found that despite their divergent governance arrangements, three forms of higher education providers – public institution, public administrative institution and private institution – have become increasingly similar because of their convergent trend towards commercialization and politicization. These two critical issues are considered threats to institutional development in Cambodia. Research limitations/implications: The interviews were conducted with the key actors at leadership and management levels. This leaves room for future research to investigate the institutional governance issue at faculty and student levels to develop a deeper understanding about the on-the-ground implementation. This paper is a useful information source for policymakers, institutional leaders and educational practitioners. Originality/value: This paper addresses the under-researched issue of institutional governance in Cambodia and critically examines the assumption that devolution and privatization of higher education in Cambodia will help advance the sector for economic development. The paper contributes to the ongoing academic debate in the higher education domain while higher education institutions are struggling to sustain their place in the competitive marketplace.",
keywords = "Autonomy, Board, Institutional governance, Privatization, Reform",
author = "Chanphirun Sam",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1108/JEC-11-2015-0051",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "414--434",
journal = "Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy",
issn = "1750-6204",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Cambodian higher education in transition : an institutional governance perspective. / Sam, Chanphirun.

In: Journal of Enterprising Communities, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2017, p. 414-434.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cambodian higher education in transition

T2 - an institutional governance perspective

AU - Sam, Chanphirun

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose: The paper aims to ascertain the governance arrangements of higher education providers in Cambodia and to seek insights into institutional governance while its higher education sector is in a significant transition towards the market model. Design/methodology/approach: The empirical research underpinning this paper applies a qualitative method, based on an interpretivist approach to inquiry. The study uses semi-structured interviews with 38 key research participants from relevant institutions. The data analysis follows a thematic coding approach. Findings: The study has found that despite their divergent governance arrangements, three forms of higher education providers – public institution, public administrative institution and private institution – have become increasingly similar because of their convergent trend towards commercialization and politicization. These two critical issues are considered threats to institutional development in Cambodia. Research limitations/implications: The interviews were conducted with the key actors at leadership and management levels. This leaves room for future research to investigate the institutional governance issue at faculty and student levels to develop a deeper understanding about the on-the-ground implementation. This paper is a useful information source for policymakers, institutional leaders and educational practitioners. Originality/value: This paper addresses the under-researched issue of institutional governance in Cambodia and critically examines the assumption that devolution and privatization of higher education in Cambodia will help advance the sector for economic development. The paper contributes to the ongoing academic debate in the higher education domain while higher education institutions are struggling to sustain their place in the competitive marketplace.

AB - Purpose: The paper aims to ascertain the governance arrangements of higher education providers in Cambodia and to seek insights into institutional governance while its higher education sector is in a significant transition towards the market model. Design/methodology/approach: The empirical research underpinning this paper applies a qualitative method, based on an interpretivist approach to inquiry. The study uses semi-structured interviews with 38 key research participants from relevant institutions. The data analysis follows a thematic coding approach. Findings: The study has found that despite their divergent governance arrangements, three forms of higher education providers – public institution, public administrative institution and private institution – have become increasingly similar because of their convergent trend towards commercialization and politicization. These two critical issues are considered threats to institutional development in Cambodia. Research limitations/implications: The interviews were conducted with the key actors at leadership and management levels. This leaves room for future research to investigate the institutional governance issue at faculty and student levels to develop a deeper understanding about the on-the-ground implementation. This paper is a useful information source for policymakers, institutional leaders and educational practitioners. Originality/value: This paper addresses the under-researched issue of institutional governance in Cambodia and critically examines the assumption that devolution and privatization of higher education in Cambodia will help advance the sector for economic development. The paper contributes to the ongoing academic debate in the higher education domain while higher education institutions are struggling to sustain their place in the competitive marketplace.

KW - Autonomy

KW - Board

KW - Institutional governance

KW - Privatization

KW - Reform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021695169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021695169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JEC-11-2015-0051

DO - 10.1108/JEC-11-2015-0051

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 414

EP - 434

JO - Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy

JF - Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy

SN - 1750-6204

IS - 3

ER -