TY - GEN
T1 - Can Today’s Machine Learning Pass Image-Based Turing Tests?
AU - Zarras, Apostolis
AU - Gerostathopoulos, Ilias
AU - Fernández, Daniel Méndez
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Artificial Intelligence (AI) in general and Machine Learning (ML) in particular, have received much attention in recent years also thanks to current advancements in computational infrastructures. One prominent example application of ML is given by image recognition services that allow to recognize characteristics in images and classify them accordingly. One question that arises, also in light of current debates that are fueled with emotions rather than evidence, is to which extent such ML services can already pass image-based Turing Tests. In other words, can ML services imitate human (cognitive and creative) tasks to an extent that their behavior remains indistinguishable from human behavior? If so, what does this mean from a security perspective? In this paper, we evaluate a number of publicly available ML services for the degree to which they can be used to pass image-based Turing Tests. We do so by applying selected ML services to 10,500 randomly collected captchas including approximately 100,000 images. We further investigate the degree to which captcha solving can become an automated procedure. Our results strengthen our confidence in that today’s available and ready-to-use ML services can indeed be used to pass image-based Turing Tests, rising new questions on the security of systems that rely on this image-based technology as a security measure.
AB - Artificial Intelligence (AI) in general and Machine Learning (ML) in particular, have received much attention in recent years also thanks to current advancements in computational infrastructures. One prominent example application of ML is given by image recognition services that allow to recognize characteristics in images and classify them accordingly. One question that arises, also in light of current debates that are fueled with emotions rather than evidence, is to which extent such ML services can already pass image-based Turing Tests. In other words, can ML services imitate human (cognitive and creative) tasks to an extent that their behavior remains indistinguishable from human behavior? If so, what does this mean from a security perspective? In this paper, we evaluate a number of publicly available ML services for the degree to which they can be used to pass image-based Turing Tests. We do so by applying selected ML services to 10,500 randomly collected captchas including approximately 100,000 images. We further investigate the degree to which captcha solving can become an automated procedure. Our results strengthen our confidence in that today’s available and ready-to-use ML services can indeed be used to pass image-based Turing Tests, rising new questions on the security of systems that rely on this image-based technology as a security measure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072862706&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072862706&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-30215-3_7
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-30215-3_7
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85072862706
SN - 9783030302146
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 129
EP - 148
BT - Information Security - 22nd International Conference, ISC 2019, Proceedings
A2 - Lin, Zhiqiang
A2 - Papamanthou, Charalampos
A2 - Polychronakis, Michalis
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 22nd International Conference on Information Security, ISC 2019
Y2 - 16 September 2019 through 18 September 2019
ER -