Carbonate fluxes by coccolithophore species between NW Africa and the Caribbean: Implications for the biological carbon pump

C.V. Guerreiro, K.-H. Baumann, G.-J.A. Brummer, A. Valente, G. Fischer, P. Ziveri, V. Brotas, J.-B.W. Stuut

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Coccolithophores are among the most important calcifying pelagic organisms. To assess how coccolithophore species with different coccolith-carbonate mass and distinct ecological resilience to ocean warming will influence the "rain ratio" and the "biological carbon pump", 1 yr of species-specific coccolith-carbonate export fluxes were quantified using sediment traps moored at four sites between NW Africa and the Caribbean (i.e., CB-20°N/21°W, at 1214 m; M1-12°N/23°W, at 1150 m; M2-14°N/37°W, at 1235 m; M4-12°N/49°W, at 1130 m). Highest coccolith-CaCO3 fluxes at the westernmost site M4, where the nutricline is deepest along the tropical North Atlantic, were dominated by deep-dwelling small-sized coccolith species Florisphaera profunda and Gladiolithus flabellatus. Total coccolith-CaCO3 fluxes of 371 mg m-2 yr-1 at M4 were followed by 165 mg m-2 yr-1 at the north-easternmost CB, 130 mg m-2 yr-1 at M1, and 114 mg m-2 yr-1 at M2 in between. Coccoliths accounted for nearly half of the total carbonate flux at M4 (45%), much higher compared to 23% at M2 and 15% at M1 and CB. At site M4, highest ratios of coccolith-CaCO3 to particulate organic carbon fluxes and weak correlations between the carbonate of deep-dwelling species and particulate organic carbon suggest that increasing productivity in the lower photic zone in response to ocean warming might enhance the rain ratio and reduce the coccolith-ballasting efficiency. The resulting weakened biological carbon pump could, however, be counterbalanced by increasing frequency of Saharan dust outbreaks across the tropical Atlantic, providing mineral ballast as well as nutrients to fuel fast-blooming and ballast-efficient coccolithophore species.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3190-3208
Number of pages19
JournalLimnology and Oceanography
Volume66
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

© 2021 The Authors. Limnology and Oceanography published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography.

Funding

The authors thank the crews of Meteor cruise M89, Pelagia cruise 64PE378, RV Poseidon cruises POS425, POS445 and POS464, as well as the NIOZ and MARUM technicians for their contributions. Moorings M4, M2, and M1 were managed by the NIOZ in the framework of the projects TRAFFIC funded by NWO (no. 822.01.008), and DUSTTRAFFIC funded by ERC (no. 311152), directed by Jan‐Berend W. Stuut. Moorings CB‐23 and CB‐24 were managed by Gerhard Fischer as part of the MARUM project GB1 (Particle flux, carbon turnover and nutrient regeneration). Lab preparation of the 1/5 split of the original sediment trap sample for M4, M2 and M1 was conducted at the NIOZ; the splitting, filtering, and SEM taxonomical analysis were performed at Uni‐Bremen, Germany. The quantification and discussion of the coccolith‐CaCO fluxes were performed at MARUM, Germany, and at MARE/Uni‐Lisbon, Portugal. The first author benefited from a Marie Sklodowska‐Curie Fellowship supported by Uni‐Bremen and the EU FP7 COFUND (grant no. 600411) and from a Marie Sklodowska‐Curie European Fellowship supported by the EU H2020‐MSCA‐IF‐2017 (grant no. 796802) within DUSTCO. Currently, the first author benefits from a research contract funded by FCT (contract CEECIND/00752/2018/CP1534/CT0011) linked to project CHASE ( www.chase-dust.com ). This study was also supported by PORTWIMS ( https://www.portwims.org ) funded by the EU's H2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant no. 810139), iFADO from ERDF funds of the INTERREG Atlantic Area Programme (contract EAPA‐165/2016), CALMED (#CTM2016‐79547‐R) and the Generalitat de Catalunya MERS (#2017 SGR‐1588). The authors acknowledge the NASA's Ocean Biology Processing Group ( https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov ), as well as the constructive suggestions and encouraging remarks by two anonymous reviewers and by the Editor‐in‐Chief Dr. K. David Hambright. 3 The authors thank the crews of Meteor cruise M89, Pelagia cruise 64PE378, RV Poseidon cruises POS425, POS445 and POS464, as well as the NIOZ and MARUM technicians for their contributions. Moorings M4, M2, and M1 were managed by the NIOZ in the framework of the projects TRAFFIC funded by NWO (no. 822.01.008), and DUSTTRAFFIC funded by ERC (no. 311152), directed by Jan-Berend W. Stuut. Moorings CB-23 and CB-24 were managed by Gerhard Fischer as part of the MARUM project GB1 (Particle flux, carbon turnover and nutrient regeneration). Lab preparation of the 1/5 split of the original sediment trap sample for M4, M2 and M1 was conducted at the NIOZ; the splitting, filtering, and SEM taxonomical analysis were performed at Uni-Bremen, Germany. The quantification and discussion of the coccolith-CaCO3 fluxes were performed at MARUM, Germany, and at MARE/Uni-Lisbon, Portugal. The first author benefited from a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship supported by Uni-Bremen and the EU FP7 COFUND (grant no. 600411) and from a Marie Sklodowska-Curie European Fellowship supported by the EU H2020-MSCA-IF-2017 (grant no. 796802) within DUSTCO. Currently, the first author benefits from a research contract funded by FCT (contract CEECIND/00752/2018/CP1534/CT0011) linked to project CHASE (www.chase-dust.com). This study was also supported by PORTWIMS (https://www.portwims.org) funded by the EU's H2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant no. 810139), iFADO from ERDF funds of the INTERREG Atlantic Area Programme (contract EAPA-165/2016), CALMED (#CTM2016-79547-R) and the Generalitat de Catalunya MERS (#2017 SGR-1588). The authors acknowledge the NASA's Ocean Biology Processing Group (https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov), as well as the constructive suggestions and encouraging remarks by two anonymous reviewers and by the Editor-in-Chief Dr. K. David Hambright.

FundersFunder number
CALMED2016‐79547‐R
DUSTTRAFFIC
EU H2020-MSCA-IF-2017
EU H2020‐MSCA‐IF‐2017796802
EU's H2020 Research and Innovation Programme
MARUM
Uni‐Bremen
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme810139
InterregEAPA‐165/2016
European Research Council311152
Fundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaCEECIND/00752/2018/CP1534/CT0011
Generalitat de Catalunya2017 SGR‐1588
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek822.01.008
Seventh Framework Programme600411
Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut voor Onderzoek der Zee
European Regional Development Fund

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Carbonate fluxes by coccolithophore species between NW Africa and the Caribbean: Implications for the biological carbon pump'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this