Carrier Sanctions and the Conflicting Legal Obligations of Carriers: Addressing Human Rights Leakage

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Carrier sanctions, by which transport companies are penalised if they do not refuse embarkation to undocumented persons, play a role in perpetuating harms (denial of refugee protection; death) against migrants. They do so because transport companies are obliged to, by legislation of destination states inEurope, North America and Australia. The potential accountability and responsibility of carriers for these harms has not been addressed in literature on human rights law. This article fills this gap through the application of Iris Young’s social connection model to address the contemporary harms of carrier sanctions. We propose that, faced with conflicting legal obligations, carriers have moral andlegal obligations to remedy, through strategic actions, the harms to which they contribute. We outline a number of possible practices that carriers can use to do so.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1
Pages (from-to)4-19
Number of pages15
JournalAmsterdam Law Forum
Volume11
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

sanction
obligation
human rights
responsibility
remedies
refugee
migrant
legislation
death
human being
Law
literature

Cite this

@article{b35d455bed9d4330963e373c6e267b2a,
title = "Carrier Sanctions and the Conflicting Legal Obligations of Carriers: Addressing Human Rights Leakage",
abstract = "Carrier sanctions, by which transport companies are penalised if they do not refuse embarkation to undocumented persons, play a role in perpetuating harms (denial of refugee protection; death) against migrants. They do so because transport companies are obliged to, by legislation of destination states inEurope, North America and Australia. The potential accountability and responsibility of carriers for these harms has not been addressed in literature on human rights law. This article fills this gap through the application of Iris Young’s social connection model to address the contemporary harms of carrier sanctions. We propose that, faced with conflicting legal obligations, carriers have moral andlegal obligations to remedy, through strategic actions, the harms to which they contribute. We outline a number of possible practices that carriers can use to do so.",
author = "T. Baird and T.P. Spijkerboer",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "4--19",
journal = "Amsterdam Law Forum",
issn = "1876-8156",
number = "1",

}

Carrier Sanctions and the Conflicting Legal Obligations of Carriers : Addressing Human Rights Leakage. / Baird, T.; Spijkerboer, T.P.

In: Amsterdam Law Forum, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1, 2019, p. 4-19.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carrier Sanctions and the Conflicting Legal Obligations of Carriers

T2 - Addressing Human Rights Leakage

AU - Baird, T.

AU - Spijkerboer, T.P.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Carrier sanctions, by which transport companies are penalised if they do not refuse embarkation to undocumented persons, play a role in perpetuating harms (denial of refugee protection; death) against migrants. They do so because transport companies are obliged to, by legislation of destination states inEurope, North America and Australia. The potential accountability and responsibility of carriers for these harms has not been addressed in literature on human rights law. This article fills this gap through the application of Iris Young’s social connection model to address the contemporary harms of carrier sanctions. We propose that, faced with conflicting legal obligations, carriers have moral andlegal obligations to remedy, through strategic actions, the harms to which they contribute. We outline a number of possible practices that carriers can use to do so.

AB - Carrier sanctions, by which transport companies are penalised if they do not refuse embarkation to undocumented persons, play a role in perpetuating harms (denial of refugee protection; death) against migrants. They do so because transport companies are obliged to, by legislation of destination states inEurope, North America and Australia. The potential accountability and responsibility of carriers for these harms has not been addressed in literature on human rights law. This article fills this gap through the application of Iris Young’s social connection model to address the contemporary harms of carrier sanctions. We propose that, faced with conflicting legal obligations, carriers have moral andlegal obligations to remedy, through strategic actions, the harms to which they contribute. We outline a number of possible practices that carriers can use to do so.

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 4

EP - 19

JO - Amsterdam Law Forum

JF - Amsterdam Law Forum

SN - 1876-8156

IS - 1

M1 - 1

ER -