Causes of reporting bias: a theoretical framework

Jenny T van der Steen, Gerben Ter Riet, Cornelis A van den Bogert, Lex M Bouter

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Reporting of research findings is often selective. This threatens the validity of the published body of knowledge if the decision to report depends on the nature of the results. The evidence derived from studies on causes and mechanisms underlying selective reporting may help to avoid or reduce reporting bias. Such research should be guided by a theoretical framework of possible causal pathways that lead to reporting bias. We build upon a classification of determinants of selective reporting that we recently developed in a systematic review of the topic. The resulting theoretical framework features four clusters of causes. There are two clusters of necessary causes: (A) motivations (e.g. a preference for particular findings) and (B) means (e.g. a flexible study design). These two combined represent a sufficient cause for reporting bias to occur. The framework also features two clusters of component causes: (C) conflicts and balancing of interests referring to the individual or the team, and (D) pressures from science and society. The component causes may modify the effect of the necessary causes or may lead to reporting bias mediated through the necessary causes. Our theoretical framework is meant to inspire further research and to create awareness among researchers and end-users of research about reporting bias and its causes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)280
JournalF1000Research
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Research
Conflict of Interest
Research Personnel
Pressure

Cite this

van der Steen, Jenny T ; Ter Riet, Gerben ; van den Bogert, Cornelis A ; Bouter, Lex M. / Causes of reporting bias : a theoretical framework. In: F1000Research. 2019 ; Vol. 8. pp. 280.
@article{62bb49f147cd4a44b0e72e40bff20bcf,
title = "Causes of reporting bias: a theoretical framework",
abstract = "Reporting of research findings is often selective. This threatens the validity of the published body of knowledge if the decision to report depends on the nature of the results. The evidence derived from studies on causes and mechanisms underlying selective reporting may help to avoid or reduce reporting bias. Such research should be guided by a theoretical framework of possible causal pathways that lead to reporting bias. We build upon a classification of determinants of selective reporting that we recently developed in a systematic review of the topic. The resulting theoretical framework features four clusters of causes. There are two clusters of necessary causes: (A) motivations (e.g. a preference for particular findings) and (B) means (e.g. a flexible study design). These two combined represent a sufficient cause for reporting bias to occur. The framework also features two clusters of component causes: (C) conflicts and balancing of interests referring to the individual or the team, and (D) pressures from science and society. The component causes may modify the effect of the necessary causes or may lead to reporting bias mediated through the necessary causes. Our theoretical framework is meant to inspire further research and to create awareness among researchers and end-users of research about reporting bias and its causes.",
author = "{van der Steen}, {Jenny T} and {Ter Riet}, Gerben and {van den Bogert}, {Cornelis A} and Bouter, {Lex M}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.12688/f1000research.18310.2",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "280",
journal = "F1000Research",
issn = "2046-1402",
publisher = "F1000 Research Ltd.",

}

Causes of reporting bias : a theoretical framework. / van der Steen, Jenny T; Ter Riet, Gerben; van den Bogert, Cornelis A; Bouter, Lex M.

In: F1000Research, Vol. 8, 2019, p. 280.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Causes of reporting bias

T2 - a theoretical framework

AU - van der Steen, Jenny T

AU - Ter Riet, Gerben

AU - van den Bogert, Cornelis A

AU - Bouter, Lex M

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Reporting of research findings is often selective. This threatens the validity of the published body of knowledge if the decision to report depends on the nature of the results. The evidence derived from studies on causes and mechanisms underlying selective reporting may help to avoid or reduce reporting bias. Such research should be guided by a theoretical framework of possible causal pathways that lead to reporting bias. We build upon a classification of determinants of selective reporting that we recently developed in a systematic review of the topic. The resulting theoretical framework features four clusters of causes. There are two clusters of necessary causes: (A) motivations (e.g. a preference for particular findings) and (B) means (e.g. a flexible study design). These two combined represent a sufficient cause for reporting bias to occur. The framework also features two clusters of component causes: (C) conflicts and balancing of interests referring to the individual or the team, and (D) pressures from science and society. The component causes may modify the effect of the necessary causes or may lead to reporting bias mediated through the necessary causes. Our theoretical framework is meant to inspire further research and to create awareness among researchers and end-users of research about reporting bias and its causes.

AB - Reporting of research findings is often selective. This threatens the validity of the published body of knowledge if the decision to report depends on the nature of the results. The evidence derived from studies on causes and mechanisms underlying selective reporting may help to avoid or reduce reporting bias. Such research should be guided by a theoretical framework of possible causal pathways that lead to reporting bias. We build upon a classification of determinants of selective reporting that we recently developed in a systematic review of the topic. The resulting theoretical framework features four clusters of causes. There are two clusters of necessary causes: (A) motivations (e.g. a preference for particular findings) and (B) means (e.g. a flexible study design). These two combined represent a sufficient cause for reporting bias to occur. The framework also features two clusters of component causes: (C) conflicts and balancing of interests referring to the individual or the team, and (D) pressures from science and society. The component causes may modify the effect of the necessary causes or may lead to reporting bias mediated through the necessary causes. Our theoretical framework is meant to inspire further research and to create awareness among researchers and end-users of research about reporting bias and its causes.

U2 - 10.12688/f1000research.18310.2

DO - 10.12688/f1000research.18310.2

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 280

JO - F1000Research

JF - F1000Research

SN - 2046-1402

ER -