TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges in Assessing Public Opinion on Economic Growth Versus Environment
T2 - Considering European and US Data
AU - Drews, Stefan
AU - Antal, Miklós
AU - van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - The enduring scientific debate about economic growth versus the environment has recently received new impetus. Nonetheless, there is virtually unanimous support for growth in politics. This may partly be due to an assumed social consensus about the desirability of growth. Here we examine public perceptions relevant to the growth debate by using data from a large number of representative surveys conducted in Europe and the US. The main findings are: (i) a relative majority of respondents seem to believe that economic growth and environmental protection are compatible, even though a fraction of the population might have unstable opinions; (ii) when people have to choose, environmental protection is prioritized in most surveys and countries; and (iii) the public has limited factual knowledge of relevant concepts and data, such as the meaning of economic growth and past GDP growth rates. These findings are discussed and further qualified. We highlight the importance of methodological aspects such as question wording and format in the interpretation of the results and draw implications for political debate and future research on economic growth and the environment.
AB - The enduring scientific debate about economic growth versus the environment has recently received new impetus. Nonetheless, there is virtually unanimous support for growth in politics. This may partly be due to an assumed social consensus about the desirability of growth. Here we examine public perceptions relevant to the growth debate by using data from a large number of representative surveys conducted in Europe and the US. The main findings are: (i) a relative majority of respondents seem to believe that economic growth and environmental protection are compatible, even though a fraction of the population might have unstable opinions; (ii) when people have to choose, environmental protection is prioritized in most surveys and countries; and (iii) the public has limited factual knowledge of relevant concepts and data, such as the meaning of economic growth and past GDP growth rates. These findings are discussed and further qualified. We highlight the importance of methodological aspects such as question wording and format in the interpretation of the results and draw implications for political debate and future research on economic growth and the environment.
KW - Economic growth
KW - Environmental sustainability
KW - Political debate
KW - Public opinion
KW - Public preferences
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033455838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033455838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85033455838
VL - 146
SP - 265
EP - 272
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
SN - 0921-8009
ER -