Challenges in the attribution of river flood events

Paolo Scussolini*, Linh Nhat Luu, Sjoukje Philip, Wouter R. Berghuijs, Dirk Eilander, Jeroen C.J.H. Aerts, Sarah F. Kew, Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Willem H.J. Toonen, Jan Volkholz, Dim Coumou

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Advances in the field of extreme event attribution allow to estimate how anthropogenic global warming affects the odds of individual climate disasters, such as river floods. Extreme event attribution typically uses precipitation as proxy for flooding. However, hydrological processes and antecedent conditions make the relation between precipitation and floods highly nonlinear. In addition, hydrology acknowledges that changes in floods can be strongly driven by changes in land-cover and by other human interventions in the hydrological system, such as irrigation and construction of dams. These drivers can either amplify, dampen or outweigh the effect of climate change on local flood occurrence. Neglecting these processes and drivers can lead to incorrect flood attribution. Including flooding explicitly, that is, using data and models of hydrology and hydrodynamics that can represent the relevant hydrological processes, will lead to more robust event attribution, and will account for the role of other drivers beyond climate change. Existing attempts are incomplete. We argue that the existing probabilistic framework for extreme event attribution can be extended to explicitly include floods for near-natural cases, where flood occurrence was unlikely to be influenced by land-cover change and human hydrological interventions. However, for the many cases where this assumption is not valid, a multi-driver framework for conditional event attribution needs to be established. Explicit flood attribution will have to grapple with uncertainties from lack of observations and compounding from the many processes involved. Further, it requires collaboration between climatologists and hydrologists, and promises to better address the needs of flood risk management. This article is categorized under: Paleoclimates and Current Trends > Modern Climate Change Paleoclimates and Current Trends > Detection and Attribution Assessing Impacts of Climate Change > Observed Impacts of Climate Change.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere874
JournalWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Sjoukje Philip, Sarah F. Kew, and Dim Coumou received funding of the XAIDA project from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 101003469.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. WIREs Climate Change published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Funding

Sjoukje Philip, Sarah F. Kew, and Dim Coumou received funding of the XAIDA project from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 101003469.

FundersFunder number
Horizon 2020101003469
Horizon 2020

    Keywords

    • climate change impacts
    • extreme event attribution
    • flood risk management
    • hydrology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges in the attribution of river flood events'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this